Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Collection: Directories and Documents > Pamphlets
The Great Watershed of California (PH 20-7)(1978) (57 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 57

PREFACE
One hundred years ago when extensive government surveys were being
carried on in the Far West, the Great Basin began to attract the attention of
geologists because of the widespread Pleistocene lakes which had become
trapped in this interior closed basin. The interest of scientists in the
phenomenal features of this particular enormous seemingly collapsed area in
the midst of the high Rocky Mountain region has since never waned. Early
reports outlined the Great Basin, without the benefit of accurate detailed
topographic maps, which were then scarce.
It was quite obvious that California had a large share in the Great Basin and
that the barrier wall of the abrupt eastern side of the Sierra Nevada was more
than a match to its counterpart of the Wasatch Mountains whose own high
western wall stands guard over the Great Salt Lake.
Waldemar Lindgren (sent out to California in 1896 by the newly organized
United States Geological Survey with a group of some of the foremost
geologists of the nation) completed mapping the Gold Belt of the Sierra
Nevada and prepared a summary Professional Paper (173) on the Tertiary
gold-bearing gravels of the Sierra. This study took him right up to the very top
of the crest where the drainage boundary between the Great Basin and Pacific
Ocean traverses the eastern mountains of California. In his intense interest in
the geological history of how it got there and where it came from, he showed on
his geologic maps of the northern Sierra, two critical lines: one is the “present
divide between the Pacific Ocean and the Great Basin”; the other, the “preTertiary divide” which he also called the “Cretaceous crest line of range and
the Great Basin.”
Maps have always fascinated me. Shaded relief maps are beautiful to look
at — they are geographic works of art. Contour maps show relief; though not
so artistic, they are more accurate, because they present measured heights and
distances. Other features, like the intricate lines, colors, patterns, names, and
symbols which go with geologic maps can be printed right over the
topographic contour maps, which also show streams, culture and more names.
The one feature which none of these fine maps shows is the drainage divide
lines. These are left to the hydrographers to draw on special maps, not so
cluttered with information considered irrelevant. Their hydrographic maps,
however, show all the water basins, not just the one that is closed — the Great
Basin.
That part of the Great Basin which is in California is bounded by a line
running for 1000 miles from the Oregon border on the north to the Nevada
border in the Mojave Desert. It runs along the unbroken crest of the high
eastern mountains of the State, outlining what I call the Great Watershed of
California. Part of the water falling upon the crest flows into the interior
closed Great Basin and the other part joins the long western rivers whose
waters finally reach the Pacific Ocean.
In following this crest on topographic maps, it is found to run right over
rugged peaks and through areas of critical interest, always with contrasting
views on either side, without concern with the geology — its only requirement
being to enclose the Basin with an unbroken border.
After completing the log of the Great Watershed’s Divide, one question
keeps plaguing me: Why does the divide persist in maintaining an unbroken
course and — if broken — what will happen to it? Perhaps thereis the answer
to its peculiar peregrinations through such places as the Mojave Desert!
vii.