Search Nevada County Historical Archive
Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
To search for an exact phrase, use "double quotes", but only after trying without quotes. To exclude results with a specific word, add dash before the word. Example: -Word.

Collection: Directories and Documents > Pamphlets

Twenty-One Mining Company vs. Original Sixteen to One Mine Inc. Brief for Appellee (PH 10-7)(02-01-1917) (49 pages)

Go to the Archive Home
Go to Thumbnail View of this Item
Go to Single Page View of this Item
Download the Page Image
Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard
Don't highlight the search terms on the Image
Show the Page Image
Show the Image Page Text
Share this Page - Copy to the Clipboard
Reset View and Center Image
Zoom Out
Zoom In
Rotate Left
Rotate Right
Toggle Full Page View
Flip Image Horizontally
More Information About this Image
Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard
Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)
Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 49  
Go
Loading...
8 ity of its 250-foot level on its main Sixteen to One vein as it passed on its dip outside of the vertical boundaries of its Sixteen to One claim; a portion of which level is situated vertically beneath Sixteen to One surface and the remainder beyond and beneath the surface of defendant’s Belmont claim. Plaintiff, wishing to be absolutely fair and equitable in the matter, though suffering serious loss thereby (Tr. 109, 110), upon the issuance of the injunction against defendant, ceased working underneath defendant's Belmont surface and gave defendant ample time and opportunity to apply for a cross or reciprocal injunction, No such application was : Proceed to extract bb nd DS) pam . : shee high-grade”’ ore without interference. The Court.