Search Nevada County Historical Archive
Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
To search for an exact phrase, use "double quotes", but only after trying without quotes. To exclude results with a specific word, add dash before the word. Example: -Word.

Collection: Directories and Documents > Pamphlets

Twenty-One Mining Company vs. Original Sixteen to One Mine Inc. Brief for Appellee (PH 10-7)(02-01-1917) (49 pages)

Go to the Archive Home
Go to Thumbnail View of this Item
Go to Single Page View of this Item
Download the Page Image
Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard
Don't highlight the search terms on the Image
Show the Page Image
Show the Image Page Text
Share this Page - Copy to the Clipboard
Reset View and Center Image
Zoom Out
Zoom In
Rotate Left
Rotate Right
Toggle Full Page View
Flip Image Horizontally
More Information About this Image
Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard
Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)
Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 49  
Go
Loading...
No. 2909. In the United States Cirewt Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circwt. TWENTY-ONE MINING COMPANY, a Corporation, 7 Appellant, VS. ORIGINAL SIXTEEN TO ONE MINH, INC., a Corporation, Appellee. Brief for Appellee. STATEMENT OF THE CASE. The statement of the case appearing in appellant’s prief omits many facts which are material to a presentation of this appeal from appellee’s standpoint, and in order that these omitted facts may appear in their proper sequence, the following restatement of the case is made: For purposes of explanation and convenient reference, two plats are inserted in this brief, which show the mining properties of both parties, the mine workings and the vein, in horizontal and in vertical sections. (Opp. p. 20 of this brief, for vertical section.) The plaintiff below (appellee) is the owner of the Sixteen to One lode mining claim. Defendant (appellant) is the owner of the Belmont, Tightner Extension, and Valentine claims. The Ophir and the Eclipse Extension claims, shown on the map, belong to third parties. For many years prior to the com-.