Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Papers of John P. Harrington (12 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 12

1991 JOHN R. JOHNSON, AMY MILLER, AND LINDA AGREN 369
the Museum sought funding for further organization of the Harrington collection as part of a larger proposed project that encompassed the overall management of the Museum archives. Unfortunately, attempts to secure grant support
were unsuccessful. Hudson’s untimely death in 1985 and plans for the anthropology department to move to a new facility further delayed archival work with
the collection until fall 1991.
In November 1991, the authors began to inventory and sort material contained in the thirty boxes. The remainder of this paper is devoted to a detailed
description of their contents (Mills et al. 1989; Mills and Mills 1991).
Ethnographic and linguistic papers
A detailed inventory of Harrington’s ethnographic and linguistic papers (six
boxes) is nearly complete. The papers, which were thoroughly mixed despite
the preliminary sorting by Travis Hudson, are currently being organized
according to the same categories and method of arrangement used by Harrington project editor Elaine Mills for the Smithsonian’s microfilm publication of
Harrington’s notes (Mills 1981, 1985, 1988; Mills and Brickfield 1986a, 1986b,
19874, 1987b).
Researchers who expect major troves of missing portions of Harrington's
field notes among this material will be disappointed. Much of the collection
consists of transcripts or photostats, notes from his library research, and drafts
of papers he later published or intended to publish. Among miscellaneous
items are lecture notes and exams for courses that Harrington taught in Colorado and San Diego, California, and papers from some of his own college course
work in linguistics. It is important to note that there are some surprising tidbits here and there that relate to primary ethnographic and linguistic research. The linguistic material consists of odds and ends of data from a number
of different groups, mostly from California, but it also includes data on Kiowa,
Pueblo, Mayan, and Arabic languages, among others.
In terms of volume and research importance, the Chumash papers in the
collection may be the most significant. For example, Harrington’s original
handwritten notes from Fernando Librado, recorded in 1912-13, are present in
their original order of elicitation. These notes were later extracted by Harrington and typed for inclusion in his slip files. It has been the slip files, rather
than the original manuscripts, that have formed the basis for our present
understanding of Chumash traditional history and ceremonial practices as
reconstructed in such publications as Eye of the Flute and Breath of the Sun
(Hudson et al. 1977; Hudson 1979). The original order and form of these notes
will help to shed light on whether meanings have been misunderstood or information lost between the time of Harrington’s interviews with Librado and
when the various extracted slips were recombined for publication more than
sixty years later. ,