Search Nevada County Historical Archive
Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
To search for an exact phrase, use "double quotes", but only after trying without quotes. To exclude results with a specific word, add dash before the word. Example: -Word.

Collection: Directories and Documents > Pamphlets

PH 2-4 (ca. 1905) (90 pages)

Go to the Archive Home
Go to Thumbnail View of this Item
Go to Single Page View of this Item
Download the Page Image
Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard
Don't highlight the search terms on the Image
Show the Page Image
Show the Image Page Text
Share this Page - Copy to the Clipboard
Reset View and Center Image
Zoom Out
Zoom In
Rotate Left
Rotate Right
Toggle Full Page View
Flip Image Horizontally
More Information About this Image
Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard
Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)
Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 90  
Loading...
the man who knows what he is doing derstands the ins and the outs of in dustry. A mining district is not completely cover ducing mines any more than an agricultural section js completely covered with producing farms, Sometimes two farms may adjoin each other; so far as the fertility and productiveness of the soil is concerned they are equal, One of them is producing liberally, the other is losing money. One of them is in the hands of a bad farmer— the other in the hands of a good one. The same may be true in mining. ‘Two mines may be upon the same vein; one may be a producing mine, and the other a non-producer. ‘ : Again, one Property may have capital to make it 2 success, the other has none. The same might be true of the farms, and thoroughly unvestment in the ined with pro‘ys 2 The other day we received in Rhode Island, in which “Would you advise me to w a letter from an investor he asked this question: ait until this property (naming the one) has become a producer before purchasing stock?” This isa mighty hard proposition to tackle. \Ve know the Property and know that the man who purchases stock in it now at 25 cents per share is helping the company make a mine. After the mine is made his cash will not be needed. Whether it will ever mak or not would be purely a matter dications are good and the Property ought to be one in Which the investor would receive returns. The mistake has been made in the Prospectus. Promises have been made that could not Possibly be kept, because the company has not the territory, the cash or the Management to do what It promises to do, Yet it may do half of this, and if it does it will be doing well by the investor The investor should we atch the Prospectus closely. It > a 4 o e€ a great mine of conjecture. ‘The in-