Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Reconsidering the Legacies of Colonialism in Native North America (January 2013) (19 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 19

ARCHAEOLOGIES OF PERSISTENCE: RECONSIDERING THE
LEGACIES OF COLONIALISM IN NATIVE NORTH AMERICA
Lee M. Panich
This article seeks to define common ground from which to build a more integrated approach to the persistence of indigenous societies in North America. Three concepts are discussed—identity, practice, and context—that may prove useful for
the development of archaeologies of persistence by allowing us to counter terminal narratives and essentialist concepts of
cultural identity that are deeply ingrained in scholarly and popular thinking about Native American societies. The use of
these concepts is illustrated in an example that shows how current archaeological research is challenging long-held scholarly and popular beliefs about the effects of colonialism in coastal California, where the policies of Spanish colonial missionaries have long been thought to have driven local native peoples to cultural extinction. By exploring how the sometimes
dramatic changes of the colonial period were internally structured and are just one part of long and dynamic native histories, archaeologies of persistence may help to bring about a shift in how the archaeology of colonialism presents the histories of native peoples in North America—one that can make archaeology more relevant to descendant communities.
Este articulo define los puntos comunes para construir un enfoque integral sobre la persistencia de sociedades indigenas en
Norteamérica. Tres conceptos son discutidos—la identidad, la prdctica, y el contexto—que puede resultar util para el desarrollo de las arqueologias de persistencia, permitiéndonos contradecir las narrativas terminales y el esencialismo de identidad cultural que son inculcadas profundamente en el pensamiento arqueolégico y popular sobre sociedades indigenas
americanas. Para ilustrar el uso de dichos conceptos, este articulo examina las maneras en c6mo las presentes investigaciones arqueolégicas estan desafiando las creencias populares y antropoldgicas acerca de los efectos del colonialismo en la costa
de California, donde se ha pensado que las politicas de misioneros coloniales espajioles exterminaron las culturas nativas
locales. Explorando cémo los cambios dramdticos del periodo colonial fueron estructurados internamente y el hecho de que
son solamente una parte de historias nativas, dindmicas y largas, las arqueologias de persistencia pueden ayudar a producir
un cambio en cémo la arqueologia del colonialismo presenta las historias de pueblos nativos en Norteamérica—uno que puede
hacer la arqueologia mds pertinente para comunidades indigenas actuales y futuras.
n considering how Native American groups North America, often seen in terms of demohave negotiated Euro-American colonialism,
archaeologists often focus on the topic of
change, whether it is cultural, demographic, or
environmental. Yet hundreds of Native American
communities have persisted into the present despite repeated popular and academic claims of
their imminent demise (McGuire 1997). By examining multiple scales of analysis—daily practices as well as long-term processes—
archaeologists can provide important insights into
the interconnected nature of continuity and change
in indigenous polities and identities. Current archaeological research directly challenges conventional wisdom about the legacies of colonialism in
graphic collapse and cultural extinction, by examining how changes in native societies were internally structured and how such transformations
may have in fact facilitated continuity. I call these
frameworks archaeologies of persistence.
As the plural form archaeologies suggests, archaeologists interested in such questions come
from diverse theoretical and professional backgrounds. This article seeks to establish common
ground from which we may move toward a more
integrated approach to the study of how indigenous peoples in North America, and elsewhere,
negotiated the constraints and opportunities of
colonialism. I review recent developments in
Lee M. Panich ™ Department of Anthropology, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, California
95053 ([email protected])
American Antiquity 78(1), 2013, pp. 105-122
Copyright ©2013 by the Society for American Archaeology
105