Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
The Nisenan Photographs of Alexander W. Chase (2016) (15 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 15

324 Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology . Vol. 36, No.2 (2016)
Figure 10. Death of Coast Miwok chief at Bodega Bay, 1818 (Tikhanoy watercolor, after Hudson and Bates 2015:Fig. 7.6).
Courtesy of the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.
of a lead pencil.. The elaborate feather plumes were
employed in dances only, while the ordinary ones were
worn daily by chiefs and other men of importance.
They were usually worn in pairs, being so placed in the
hair as to project forward at an angle from the top of
the head [1933:227].
Unfortunately, there is an even greater paucity
of ethnographic information on the abalone-bangle
necklaces present in a number of the images shown
here. Abalone bangles in a variety of forms are well
represented in archaeological collections, and are present
in some numbers in ethnohistoric collections as well (see
discussion in Hudson and Bates 2015:152-56). Although
Powers discusses them solely as items of wealth, it is
quite likely that they had a significant non-economic
dimension as well (as the extraordinary abalone gorgets
worn by the members of the Lewis family undoubtedly
did); their frequent association with the more elaborate
hairnets and hairpins worn by men known to be chiefs is
again suggestive though not definitive.
In our efforts to elicit information from these images,
it is tempting to use familiar categories in describing or
interpreting what we see, and to talk about articles of
apparel, adornment, wealth, prestige, or regalia, but such
categories are neither simple nor mutually exclusive.
For example, a police officer’s badge, a priest’s cassock,
or a king’s crown are all items of regalia, yet their social
significance varies considerably, as do the contexts
within which they are normally encountered. Thus my
suggestions regarding the possible symbolic referents
of certain of the items on Powers’ list are nothing more
than an initial sketch of possibilities, and a tentative one
at best. Other people may very well come to different
conclusions, but the data are now available for alternate
interpretations.