Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
The Valley Nisenan (20 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 20

Kroeber: The Valley Nisenan Si 281
“father. Surd stops were recorded both aspirated and unaspirated.
“The distinction may be functional; or the stops written as unaspirated
‘surds and as sonants may really constitute only one series: the sonants
F ppear to have a less prolonged sonancy than in English. . Two
uliar sonants were heard, bY and d’, different from b.and d;:in the
former a heavy labialization seemed to obtrude, in the latter, glottal‘ization. These evidently correspond to Dixon’s ‘‘inspirational’’ b
dd.** Final surd stops are often not released ; that is, they consist
ly of occlusion: k, ¢, p. These were difficult to distinguish from
me another and from glottal stops, and errors may have crept into
he record. There are also released final surd stops. Glottalized stops
were not heard at the ends of words. The surd stops occur interocalically with lengthened occlusion: k’, t’, p’, also t’e. The inform~ ant’s loss of upper teeth made the determination of the dental-alveolar
group uncertain as to true dental articulation. Mostly t and d were
heard alveolar, about as in English. A post-alveolar or pre-palatal
t was repeatedly recorded, but also confused with te.
Continuants.—These include s, s, ¢, j; . and J; m, m, n, 2; W, Y;
h, h; and the affricatives ts, te. There are probably. two organic
s-sounds, s and ¢, the latter made with less flat tongue than English
sh, and s representing a more s-like apperception of it. Inter-vocalic
was sometimes doubtfully heard sonant and written j, as in pujune.
It may be questioned whether this is a separate organic constituent of
the language. Its limitation of position suggests sonant infection .of
: by the adjacent vowels. There appear to-be two l-sounds: / is thick
in quality, and perhaps produced with more sudden articulation both
i) APPENDIX: LANGUAGE Be
Since there is practically no Nisenan linguistic material accessible.
beyond old word lists, the vocabulary obtained is given in full. Manys
minor points of culture have been embodied therein. For this reason
the arrangement is topical, not alphabetical: It must be borne ine
mind that this vocabulary represents the extreme southwestern forinl
of Nisenan, and of the Maidu stock as well; and that both in the valley
along lower Feather river and in the hills on the middle courses of
American river, speech, though still Nisenan or Southern Maidu, was 3
somewhat different. 3
bine satis IR BEL
i
Pe
an
ee
Phonetics 4
Vowels.—An a of less clear quality than ‘‘normal’’ a, due probably 4
to partial tongue elevation, was occasionally heard, as in Aka’n, a small”
fish; but being observed only in short syllables, it may not be an
organic sound of the language. The vowels e, i, 0, u are usually if not _
always open. <A few cases of apparent closer quality have been indi~
eated by the macron, thus, i’. Of impure vowels, both ii and 6 seem 5
to occur. They are unrounded, as in Shoshonean and Yokuts, and ‘
perhaps better represented by i and é. Of the two, ii is much the .
commoner; 6 possibly represents only a variant apperception.
Final vowels—and it may be assumed all vowels organically—seem
either to end in a surd aspiration or in a glottal stop: a‘ and a’. The ~
feebleness of the informant’s larynx led to many being recorded with—
out differentiation of termination. Most of these are likely to be :
aspirated, the glottal stop being generally easier to hear. An initial :
glottal stop was sometimes recorded, but more often is likely not to
have been heard.
at beginning and end. It was chiefly recorded finally, sometimes
initially. The nasal continuants are often surd when findl: m,n. A
_ glottal stop was sometimes detected, and sometimes not, between vowel
and consonant: a’n and an. I suspect that all final sonant nasals were
" imperfectly written: an should always be an, but az and a’n differ.
There is no # (ng) on careful enunciation; nor x (palatal fricative) ;
an occasional somewhat constricted h preceding another consonant has
been written h.
Length.—Long vowels and consonants have been indicated by the
same device, a superior period. Long consonants recorded are the
stops, 1, n,m, w. They occur chiefly after short vowels. Syllables are
long, accordingly, either in the vowel or in the consonant.
Diphthongs are frequent: ai, ei, iii, Gi, ui, au, iu, ete., and of a 4
duration equivalent to a single long or short vowel. Where the vowels
seemed to constitute separate syllables without an intervening glottal 4
stop, they have been separated by a hyphen.
Stops——These appear to occur in three series, surd, sonant, and ~
. glottalized: The latter are feeble, and may not always have been ‘
distinguished. They are both organic, as in k’um, dance house, and
induced (stop + glottal stop) as in nik’e’i (nik-’e’i), my older brother—
.
WT rete pes: RMR tS AB
33 Bur. Am. Ethn., Bull. 40, pt. 1:684, 1911.
An CES ery ms
et. nik’ai (nik-ka“i), my great-grandfather, nik-pa’pa, my mother’s
[ -sersnemecesnaeseeererer ae
seepeeenepmrialigeinnnr oceecipaae ae