Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Genetics, Linguistics, and Prehistoric Migrations [DNA Analysis] (32 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 32

ARTICLE . Genetics, Linguistics, and Prehistoric Migrations: An Analysis of California Indian Mitochondrial ONA Lineages . Johnson / Lorenz 55
features among American Indian languages (Nichols
2002:287—290). Furthermore, Klar (2002) reports
evidence of a non-Chumashan substrate in the Cruzefio
language. Analysis of ancient mtDNA samples will be
necessary to determine whether Haplogroup A and
Haplogroup D lineages have equal antiquity in the Santa
Barbara region.
Haplogroup A lineages characterized our single
Esselen sample and three of our Salinan samples,
suggesting that these could well have persisted from the
same early colonization along the Pacific shoreline that
resulted in the establishment of a population along the
Santa Barbara Channel (Eshleman et al. 2004; Eshleman
and Smith, in press). The linguistic evidence for ancient
contact between Esselen and the Chumashan languages
(Shaul 1988), and the presence of Haplogroup A lineages
from prehistoric burials in the Big Sur region (Eshleman
2002:122), could signify that a Salinan language was not
initially spoken in the coastal region. It is possible that the
three Haplogroup A lineages among our Salinan samples
may have previously existed in the region prior to being
absorbed during a Salinan expansion towards the coast
under pressure from an incoming migration of Yokutsan
groups into the Central Valley region from the Great
Basin (see Golla, in press).
Similarly, rare instances of Haplogroup A lineages
among the Yokuts and Luisefio samples were likely
derived from earlier populations that were incorporated
into expanding groups who arrived later in these
respective regions (see also Eshleman and Smith, in
press). The Yokuts Haplogroup A haplotype (A08) is
particularly interesting because it is identical to a sequence
reported from a prehistoric burial in Esselen territory,
thus further suggesting an original coastal connection
for this haplotype (Eshleman 2002:122). Haplogroup
A lineages also have been identified among prehistoric
populations living in marginal areas, such as the San
Clemente Islanders and the Perict of the southern tip
of Baja California (Endicott et al. 2004; Potter 2004).
This pattern is fully consistent with the expectations
of an initial coastal migration hypothesis, in which this
haplogroup became established early among peoples with
a maritime subsistence base and then persisted in certain
coastal locations despite later population expansions.°
Based on an earlier subset of the data reported more
fully here (Tables 2-6), Eshleman et al. (2004) noted a
perceived similarity in haplogroup distributions between
the Takic and Yuman groups of southern California and
certain Great Basin and Plateau groups, and Eshleman
and Smith (in press) further note that the Takic distribution
is similar to that of more ancient central California
populations. The examination of specific haplotypes among
these populations, however, shows that there is much
greater genetic distance between them than was suggested
by overall similarities in their haplogroup distributions.
The migration of Uto-Aztecan groups into southern
California appears to have resulted in the introduction
of new genetic lineages into the area, as well as language
replacement. At least one non-Yuman and nonChumashan language once existed in this region, as is
demonstrated by a lexical and phonological substratum of
undetermined affiliation in Gabrielino (Bright and Bright
1976). Here and there, especially in the desert areas and
on San Clemente Island, there exist hints of the surviving
mtDNA lineages of the earlier inhabitants of southern
California. The distinctive Haplogroup C haplotype
discerned among the Vanyumé; the rare presence of
Haplogroup D lineages among the Vanyumé, Desert
Cahuilla, and Island Gabrielino; and the sole Haplogroup
A sample from the most interior of the Luisefio villages,
are probable survivals from the pre-Takic period. The
fact that these lineages all persisted in relatively marginal
areas suggests that the dryer, desert regions served as
refugia for peoples who otherwise came to speak the
language of a dominant incoming group who co-opted
more favorable habitats.
Eshleman and Smith (in press) and Golla (in press)
have given thorough consideration to the evidence
pertaining to the timing and spread of language families
included within the Penutian macro-unit (see also
Moratto 1984). Our data for Wintuan (3 samples) are still
too sparse to come to meaningful conclusions regarding
the spread of this language family in Northern California,
other than to note that at least one Wintu lineage is shared
with the linguistically unrelated Achumawi/Atsugewi.
Our sample is likewise too small to test the hypothesis
that the Miwok-Costanoan (Utian) family may have had
a longer presence in California than the Yokutsan family;
however, we did find a genetic pattern that supports the
reconstruction of a relatively late expansion of Yokuts
peoples in the San Joaquin region with concomitant
absorption of older mtDNA lineages and intermarriage