Search Nevada County Historical Archive
Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
To search for an exact phrase, use "double quotes", but only after trying without quotes. To exclude results with a specific word, add dash before the word. Example: -Word.

Collection: Directories and Documents > Tanis Thorne Native Californian & Nisenan Collection

Hawaiian History in Northern California (April 2004) (24 pages)

Go to the Archive Home
Go to Thumbnail View of this Item
Go to Single Page View of this Item
Download the Page Image
Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard
Don't highlight the search terms on the Image
Show the Page Image
Show the Image Page Text
Share this Page - Copy to the Clipboard
Reset View and Center Image
Zoom Out
Zoom In
Rotate Left
Rotate Right
Toggle Full Page View
Flip Image Horizontally
More Information About this Image
Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard
Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)
Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 24  
Loading...
sense they were very much alike. Both the California Indians and the Hawaiians lived in accordance with nature as opposed to the EuroAmerican notion that the frontier was an inexhaustible resource to be manipulated at a profit. Indians along the Sacramento and Feather Rivers were excellent fishermen and so were the Kanakas. Steven Powers, one of California’s first ethnographers, observed that the indigenous people of northern California, “were almost amphibious and rival the Kanakas in their capacity to endure prolonged submergence.” Racial prejudice was also a factor that isolated Indians and Kanakas, particularly during the gold rush and the years that followed. Indians, Chinese, Kanakas, Hispanics, Blacks, Jews and others were considered exotic and therefore treated differently by Whites. In response to the large Hispanic population in the mines of the San Joaquin River watershed (the Southern Mines) the California legislature approved a Foreign Miners Tax in April of 1850. In 1856 the tax was readjusted to $4 a month where it remained until 1870 when it was determined to be unconstitutional. Between 1854 and 1870 “foreigners” paid $4,919,536 in Foreign Miners Taxthe Chinese paid an estimated 98% of that amount. From the Indian perspective they were all foreigners, but by 1850 California was already part of the United States. Most of the foreigners (non-Americans) in the mines were from the British Isles but it is unlikely that they ever paid the Foreign Miners Tax it was the miners with the darker skin who paid it. Furthermore, the tax Sutter County Historical Society 10 News Bulletin was collected by often corrupt local lawmen working on a commission basis. On September 21, 1850 the Sacramento Transcript reported an incident at Kanaka Dam, on the Yuba River, in which the collector refused the money offered but instead took the claim, then “the claims taken from the Kanakas were given to these other foreigners.” During 1851 and 1852 Indian agents who represented the U. S. Government made eighteen treaties with the Indians of California for reservations that comprised 1/14 of the total land in the state (8.5 million acres). None of those treaties were ever ratified. Instead the government chose a policy of Indian Removal to regional reservations. In the summer of 1863, hundreds of Indians from Yuba and Butte counties were gathered together for relocation by the U. S. government. Captain Augustus W. Starr and 23 cavalrymen of Company F, Second Infantry, California Volunteers, marched the Indians from Camp Bidwell to Nome Cult farm in Round Valley, Mendocino County. In his journal, Captain Starr described some of the difficulties: From Sept. 4-18 four hundred and sixty-one hapless people were forced to march one hundred miles, some of it over terrain so steep that horses could not pull wagons along. Many of them could not stand the pace, and at Mountain House on Sept. 14, one hundred fifty two of them collapsed and could go no further. April 2004