Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
History and Proposed Settlement Claims of California Indians (1944) (35 pages)
Go to the Archive Home
Go to Thumbnail View of this Item
Go to Single Page View of this Item
Download the Page Image
Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard
Don't highlight the search terms on the Image
Show the Page Image
Show the Image Page Text
Reset View and Center Image
Zoom Out
Zoom In
Rotate Left
Rotate Right
Toggle Full Page View
Flip Image Horizontally
More Information About this Image
Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard
Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)
Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 35
CLAIMS OF CALIFORNIA INDIANS 33
United States filed in March, 1941 The Defendant’s Objections to Findings of Fact Requested by the Plaintiffs, Request
for Findings of Fact, and Brief. Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief was
filed April 28, 1941,
On May 7, 1941, the facts of the Case were presented to
the Court of Claims by Attorney General Earl Warren and .
the legal points were argued by Hartwell H. Linney, Assistant
Attorney General, and the case was submitted on the merits.
The fact that the decision of the Court was not announced
ES
F
© until October 5, 1942, is explained by the further fact that
= the Court was requested by representatives of certain groups
x of Indians to delay announcement of the decision pending the
* result of efforts then being made to have the act amended so
af as to broaden the base of recovery. In response to this request
Bi Chief Justice Whaley of the Court of Claims announced that
3 the decision would be withheld for a “reasonable” length of
o£ time.
&
j Back to Court! Several years of diligent efforts to amend
unsuccessful, the Attorney General of California again sought
trial in the Court of Claims
the 1928 Act proving
to bring the action to
3——36952