Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
History and Proposed Settlement Claims of California Indians (1944) (35 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 35

CLAIMS OF CALIFORNIA INDIANS 35
a
Interest Denied! In March, 1943, the Attorney General of California petitioned the
Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the
Court of Claims which denied recovery of a possible $50,000,000 in interest.
However, this claim was denied by the Supreme Court on June 7, 1943
Supreme Court of the United States a Petition for Writ of
Certiorari to the Court of Claims to review the decision of the .
latter Court on the question of the allowance of interest and
its action in overruling the plaintiffs’ motion for new trial.™
On June 7, 1943, the Supreme Court denied the petition
for writ of certiorari without opinion or comment. (319
U. S. 764.)
Tk Fades SS 2H inh es ED RR TN She MEAS Lat ENS
sea aieg Rear
The Present Legal Situation
The precise situation now confronting the Indians in
respect to this case is this:
A commissioner has been appointed by the Court of
Claims to ascertain the values of the lands, chattels, goods and
* The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court was invoked pursuant to Section 3(b) of
the Act of February 13, 1925 (45 Stats. 936, 939) as amended by the Act of May 22, 1939
(53 Stats, 752), U. S. Code 1940 Edition, Title 28, Section 288(b), page 2522, and the
Jurisdictional Act of May 18, 1928 (45 Stats. 602).