Search Nevada County Historical Archive
Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
To search for an exact phrase, use "double quotes", but only after trying without quotes. To exclude results with a specific word, add dash before the word. Example: -Word.

Collection: Directories and Documents > Tanis Thorne Native Californian & Nisenan Collection

History and Proposed Settlement Claims of California Indians (1944) (35 pages)

Go to the Archive Home
Go to Thumbnail View of this Item
Go to Single Page View of this Item
Download the Page Image
Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard
Don't highlight the search terms on the Image
Show the Page Image
Show the Image Page Text
Share this Page - Copy to the Clipboard
Reset View and Center Image
Zoom Out
Zoom In
Rotate Left
Rotate Right
Toggle Full Page View
Flip Image Horizontally
More Information About this Image
Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard
Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)
Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 35  
Loading...
20 HISTORY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Claims in the State of California” (9 Stat. 631,634). Section 16 of this Act provides as follows: “And be it further enacted; that it shall be the duty of — the commissioners herein provided for to ascertain and report to the Secretary of the Interior the tenure by which the mission lands are held, and those held by civilized Indians, and those who are engaged in agriculture or labor of any kind, and also those which are occupied and cultivated by Pueblos or Rancheros Indians.” Clearly this section related to those Indians in California who had come under the influence and instruction of the Catholic padres. It had no reference to the uncivilized Indians outside the zone of missionization which comprised as much as five-sixths of the State of California. In the instructions to the commissioners appointed to carry out the provisions of this act no mention was made of the uncivilized tribes of Indians in the State of California. It is obvious that it was understood that their rights would be taken care of by the treaty commissioners appointed under the Act of September 30, 1850. Both acts were in operation at the same time. At the time of the passage of these two statutes most of the Indians in the State of California were untutored, illiterate and did not speak nor understand the English language. It is clear that it was never intended that they should present their claims before the commission created by the Act of March 3, 1851, supra, inasmuch as tribal occupancy has never been regarded as a “Private Land Claim.” No instructions ‘were ever issued to Indian Agents in California to present the claims of the Indians under their charge before the said commission or assist the Indians in so doing. Furthermore, the commission did not ascertain and report to the Secretary of the Interior the tenure by which was held the lands settled upon by the civilized Indians, those held by Indians engaged in agriculture of any kind, or those which were occupied and cultivated by the “Pueblos or Rancheros Indians.”