Search Nevada County Historical Archive
Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
To search for an exact phrase, use "double quotes", but only after trying without quotes. To exclude results with a specific word, add dash before the word. Example: -Word.

Collection: Books and Periodicals > Hutchings' Illustrated California Magazine

Volume 3 (1858-1859) (592 pages)

Go to the Archive Home
Go to Thumbnail View of this Item
Go to Single Page View of this Item
Download the Page Image
Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard
Don't highlight the search terms on the Image
Show the Page Image
Show the Image Page Text
Share this Page - Copy to the Clipboard
Reset View and Center Image
Zoom Out
Zoom In
Rotate Left
Rotate Right
Toggle Full Page View
Flip Image Horizontally
More Information About this Image
Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard
Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)
Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 592  
Loading...
228 HUTCHINGS’ CALIFORNIA MAGAZINE. THE MORAL POWER OF THE FAMILY HEARTHSTONE. BY R. P. CUTLER. History informs us of no period, and of no people, among whom the family hearthstone has not had its place. There is no savage or barbarous tribe that has not its sub-divisions into smaller circles, who find shelter in separate caves, or in separate huts, wigwams or cabins. __ Where, on the face of the earth, is the half-civilized, nomadic race — however united and peaceful among themselves— who yet have not separate tents to dwell in, and who do not show the instinct for family grouping? What feudal clan has not had its minuter clanship? What gipsy tribe that has not its separate grottoes, or under-ground huts ? What Hottentot race without its kraal, or village of circular hives, covered with mats? So, as we ascend in civilization, the family instinct —if I may so say—still is strong: declaring itself in the separate dwellings which crowd together in modern cities. In the order of Providence, every man stands at the head of a tribe, class, clan, or family, which is peculiarly his own: peculiarly under his control and protection, and peculiarly united to him by consanguinity, affection and name. Father, mother and children compose a group that stands together in a near and peculiar relationship—one ordained of God, and ordained to be, in some sense, separate and distincb from all others. These little communities are held together by ties such as do not admit of being extended abroad; such as are too tender and intimate to be applied to larger circles; such as are too sacred for general use. Mankind are compelled into family groups by the divine law of instinct, and are held together by the law of affection—no less divine. No project of socialism, agrarianism or communism has yet proved strong enough to break down these laws and social barriers, No general community system, it is to be presumed, can ever awaken such interest or attain such popularity as to dissolve those deep and mysterious sym~pathies which bind heart to heart in the circle of home. Many beautiful theories have been set up; many fanciful schemes have been tried, upon the basis of the community system, proposing a community of goods, a community of labor and a community of social life; but, thus far, there has been nothing better than failure. All plans of reform, grounded upon what is called the community system, or socialism, have, in all their practical results, proved to be simply Utopian, or visionary. It has been found a difficult work, and I think it will be forever found more and more an impossible work, to re-construct human society upon a new social basis. It needs no prophet to tell us that all reforms which are attempted on the ruins of the family relation, as to its exclusiveness, sacredness and intimacy, will not succeed, and can not stand. Such reforms must work against the grain of human nature, and will require more than human force to overcome the friction consequent. It may safely be predicted that the family relation, in all its present and essential characteristics, will stand, as it has stood, the test of time, of social change and successive revolutions. I do not say, nor do I believe, that social reform is impossible, or that it is not very much needed. All I attempt to say is, that whatever of reformation in existing social evils takes place, it must take place in such a manner, and be conducted by such methods