Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Indians of California by Edward Chever (12 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 12

128 JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA AND GREAT BASIN ANTHROPOLOGY
would see his trees cut down and game destroyed,
and the clear rivers turned into muddy streams,
without regret. That they refrained from seeking
satisfaction for what they regarded as intentional
wrong is more surprising.
A white woman told me one day of her spirit in
driving an Indian from her tent, by getting out her
husband’s pistol and ordering him to “vamoose.” The
Indian’s story was heard in this particular case, and
never having seen a white woman before he was
astonished at her hostile intentions, and indignant at
having been threatened when he intended no wrong.
He added that he knew now “why so few of the white
men in California were married.”
The Indians are philosophical by nature and
accept either death or suffering, when regarded as
inevitable, with composure. On one occasion, when
talking with a chief, and slapping mosquitoes with
considerable energy, killing them when I could, the
Indian remained cool and serene, quietly brushing the
little torments from his limbs, and observing my
impatience, said, “what good comes of killing a few,
the air is full of them.” When the first steamboat
passed the Indian villages I watched the Indians to
see what effect it would produce, but to my
disappointment it did not excite them or elicit any
expression of wonder. Even the steam whistle failed
to move them; they did not understand it and would
not exhibit surprise. Two years later a brig sailed up
the river and the Indians were full of excitement. The
size of the sails and the strength of the ropes came
within their comprehension, filling them with wonder.
The task of gathering fiber enough to weave so much
cloth, and such ropes, made the white man a wonderful
worker in their estimation.
It has been customary to attribute certain general
qualities to whole tribes of Indians, and this has been
done to those of whom I have written. I can only say
that no two Indians of my acquaintance were alike,
and their mode of life would naturally develop
individuality of character.
The charges of lying and stealing, as urged against
them, have some foundation in fact, although the
Indian might make some such defense as our soldiers
made to the accusation of theft of honey and chickens
while marching through the South during our late war.
They did not steal, they took what they wanted and
expected to live on the enemy. No Indian can steal
from his tribe, however, without losing his character,
and their desire to have position in the tribe makes
both men and women as careful of their reputations
as those in civilized life. Indians and white men cannot
live side by side happily, nor without fighting till the
white man is acknowledged master. The Indian is catlike, attached to localities, and kills only such game
as he needs for food; he is stealthy by nature, and
patiently waits his opportunity to strike. The white
man is migratory and carries his attachments to
strange lands, making his home where his ambition
or nature attracts him, and is destructive alike to game
or forests. The Indian, if he becomes an obstacle, is
classed with wild animals, and is hunted to the death;
this antagonism becomes mutual and is perhaps as
natural as the antipathies of cats and dogs.
The early settlement of New England was
attended by the horrors of Indian warfare, and this
struggle is the same today as then, but farther west
on the plains of Colorado and Arizona. The Indians
of California are now fed on government rations, and
instead of elk and antelope the land is grazed by herds
and flocks of domestic animals owned by the white
men, and enumerated and taxed as one of the largest
items of wealth in a rich state. The present policy of
the government of removing Indians from disputed
lands, and settling them upon reservations, is perhaps
the best thing that can be done, but much of the
management of Indians in the past has been a shameful
record of fraud, by the agents of our government who
represented the public money-bag, and of outrages
committed on emigrants by the Indians.
Many of the Indian agents, in their greed for gain,
supplied hostile tribes with rifles, ammunition and
whiskey in exchange for furs and even property
captured from the white settlers. Whisky that may.only
make a fool of the white man converts an Indian into
a fiend, and when drunk he may kill friend or foe.
The individual settler, exposed to attack, regards the
Indians as brutal and dangerous, and loses faith in
his government if it rewards with presents the wretch
who has murdered his companions, and may at any
time attack him by surprise and butcher his wife and
children.
Our government is now powerful enough to
warrant the exercise of authority and mercy. It is folly
to purchase peace of such a people by paying them
tribute, as the Indians themselves seek to propitiate