Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Collection: Books and Periodicals > Mining & Scientific Press
Volume 26 (1873) (431 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 431

54 MINING AND SCIENTIFIC PRESS. [January 25, 1873.
Mineral Land Decision.
Pre-emption Claims not Good Against Subsequent
Mining Discoveries.
A decision of wide scope and great importance has just been rendered by the Acting Secretary of the Interior, on an appeal from the
Sacramsnto Land Distriot, involving ths validity of a pre-emption claim to land thus settled
upon hefore the approval of the Act of July 26,
1866, but subsequently discoversd to be mineral. The regular Washington correspondent
of the Bulletin writss as follows to that paper:
The following correspondenoe exhibits ths full
nature of the oontroversy and ths reason on
which the decision of ths departmsnt has beon
based:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
GENERAL Lanp Orrior, August 6, 1872.
Register and Receiver, Sacramento, Cal.
Gunrtemen: The papers and tsstimoay submitted with your lettsr of Juns 17th, 1872, havs
besn examined. The only question pressnted
is in regard to ths mineral or non-mineral charactsr of ths South West quarter of the South
Wsst quarter of Section 31, T. 10 W., BR. 10 E.,
and the N. W. 4% of the N. W. ¥ of Section 6,
T. 9 W. R. 10 E., Mount Diablo Meridian.
On the 21st of December, 1870, Ekin Smith
filed D. S. No. 2,282, upon lot 20f N. W. 4,
and lots 3and 4 of the S. W. ¥, of See. 31, I,
10 N. B., 10 E, and lot 4 of N. W. 14, See 6. I,
9N., R.10E., Mt. Diablo, Meridiau. On the
12th of Julv, 1871, Thomas Stewart filed in your
office an affidavit alleging ths mineral character
of ths S. W. quarter of ths S. W. ¥{ of said
Section 31, and the N. W, 4 of the N. W. 4 of
said Sec. 6. You fixed upon the 24th of October, 1871, as the day of hearing, and cited said
Stewart to appear and offer proof as to the character of said land. Upon the evidence submitted at said hearing, you decided first, that
the land indisputeisagricultural; and, second,
that the pre-emption claimant, Ekin Smith,
was settled upon tho land, and had acquired a
pre-emption rivht thereto ‘prior to the passage
of the Act of Congress, entitled ‘‘ an Act granting the right of way,”’ etc., approved July 26,
1866; that down to the time of the passage of
said Act of Congress, no valuable mine had
been discovered on said land; that said claimant has continuously resided upon and cultivated and improved said land since his first settlement, and complied with all the provisions
of the pre-emption laws; and that therefore he
would be entitled to enter said land, even
though a mine had beeu discovered thereon
since the passage of said Act of Congress above
referred to.
Iu support of this decision you refer to the
10th section of the Act of July %6, 1866, and
state that the law says ‘“‘that whenever, prior
to the passage of thisAct, * * * there have
been homesteads made, etc., * * upon lands
upon which there have been no valuable mines
discovered, the settlers shall have aright of
pre-emption thereto.”
Upon a careful examination of the evidence,
this office is of the opinion that the testimony
taken at said hearing establishes the mineral
character of the land in dispute, and this portion of your decision is therefore reversed.
x The 10th section of the Act of Congress, approved July 26, 1866, was not correctly quoted iu
your decision, and the conclusions which you
arrived at are not correct nor in accordance
with the law itself.
The 10th section of said Act reads: ‘* That
whenever priur to the passage of this Act, upon
the lauds heretofore designated as mineral lands
which have been excluded from survey and sale,
there have bsen homesteads made by citizens
of the Uuited States, or persons who have declared their intentiouto become citiz-ns, which
homesteads bave been made, improved and
used toragricuitural purposes, and upon which
there have been uo yaluabls mines of gold, s1!ver, clunabar, or copper discovered, and which
are properly ayricultur.} lands. Said settlers
or owners of such homesteads, shall have a
right of pre-emptiou thereto,” ete.; und the
eleventh section of said Act declares ‘That
upon the survey of the lands uforesaid, the Secretary of the Interior may designate and set
apart such portious of the said lands as are
clearly agricultural lands, which lands shall
thereafter be subject to pre-emption and sale as
ne marie ae of tue United States, and
‘subject to all the laws and regulations icable to the same.” S ee
It 1s clear trom the language of this statute
that Congress did not intend to abolish or do
away with the distinction betweeu mineral and
agricuitural lands, or to allow mineral lands to
be clussed and disposed of as azricultural; but
it simply providesthut the publicsurveys might
bs exteuded over aregiun that was so clearly
mineral in character that it had previous to the
passage of said Act of Congress been reserved
for mineral purposes and that such tracts as
should appear to be properly and clearly agricultural might be disposed of under the laws applicable tu agricultural lands.
Said section gives no rights, in other words
to agricultnral claimants, exoept to such lands
as are clearly and properly agricultural. If the
theory advocated by you in said decision was to
be received as the proper construction of said
Act of Congress of July 26, 1866, the law would
be a nullity, and patents could only issue for
such miming claims as had beeu discovered
prior to July 26, 1866.
‘This portion of your decision isalso reversed.
You will inform all parties in interest of this
decision, allowing sixty days from the date of
your notification in which an appeal may bs
taken to the Hon. Secretary of the Interior.
Please acknowledgs ths receipt hsreof.
Wiis Droummonp, Commissioner.
Letter From the Acting Secretary of the Interfor—
Commisstoner Drummond’s Decision Affirmed.
DEPaRTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Wasunineton, D. C., Decembsr 17, 1872.
Hon. Willis Drummond, Commissioner General
Land Office:
Srr—I have examined ths case of Ekin Smith
ys. Absolom Stswart, involving the right of
said Smith to enter under ths pre-emption law,
as agricultural land, the southwsst qnarter of
the southwest quarter section 31, T. 10. N. R
10 E., and northwest quarter ‘of northwest
quarter section 6, T. 9. N. R. 10, E. M. D. M.,
California, on appeal from your decision of August 6, 1872
Two questions are presented on appsal: One
relating to ths character of the land claimed;
ths other calling for a constructionof ths tenth
section of ths Mineral Act of July 26, 1866 (14
Statute, 253), on both of which questions your
decisiou was adverse to the pre-emption claimant. After a careful revisw of the voluminous
testimony taken before the local officers, J am
satisfied that the landin controversy is mineral
in character and shonld bs hsld for disposition
onder the Mining Statutes. It is claimed on
behalf of the pre-emption claimant that the 10th
section of the Act of 1866 gavs to qualified persons who had prior to the passage of said Act
mads homesteads on lands theretofore designated as mineral and excluded from survey and
sale, a right of pre-emption or homestead therein, unless before the passage of said Act valuable mines of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper,
had been discovered therson, and further, that
the subseqent discovery of such mines did not
affect the right of pre-emption or homestead
thus acquired. J fully agree with you that this
is not the proper constructiou to be given to
the Act referred to. Cougress did not, I think,
intend in this Act to do away with well established distinction, so long recognized by legislation, between agricultural and mineral lands,
or to allow landsactually mineral tobe acquired
under agricultural laws. I think the object of
the tenth section was to give to persons who
had in good faith, made agricultural settlement
on public land theretofore designated as mineral, but subsequently to be agricultural, a preference in pre-empting or entering the land as
homesteads over those admitted to similar
right by the eleventh section.
The department has heretofore given this
construction to the Act in question by approviug your instructions of December 2d and 7th,
1871, and March 20, 1872, to the Register aud
Receiver at Stockton, California, direoting the
witbdrawal from disposition, under agricultural
laws, of certain lands theretofore classed as agricnltural, until the nou-mineral character of
the same should be affirmatively established. I
therefore affirm your decision, and return herewith the papers transmitted with your letter of
the 26th ultimo. Very respectfully,
B. R. Cowen, Acting Secretary.
Another Important Dectsion—Local Errors of Record do not Vitiate Selections of Land Actually
Made by the State Under ths Internal Improvement Act.
The Secretary of the Interior to-day decided
in a case appealed from Solano county, California, that the right of the State attached toa
certain ‘‘selection ’’ made in Decemher, 1853,
under the Internal Improvement Act and was
not impaired by the failure of the Register to
transmit a proper record of the selection to the
General Land Office.
SincuLaR Stonx.—The Sacramento Union describes a curiosity found in a bed of gravel in
that city, fourteen feet below the surface, while
the discoverer was digztug awell. Itis composed of rock, hard a» tlint, dark green in color,
with white specks, perfectly round and smootb,
a out3%inchesinIenyth, about aninchin dianeutin the ecuter, aud tapering toa point at either
cad. About half an inch irom one end a hole
has been drilled through it and a groove cut
from the hole around the end of the stone, as if
it was Intended to pass a line through the hole
and suspend the stune by it. The rock, however, is so excessively hard that it is almost impossible to scraich il, 1nd the question therefore
arises as to what sort of an instrument the
aboligine that did the drilling — whioh was
probably performed hundreds of years ago—
used.
A Mr.Jenzms, of Atchison, Kansas, has
patented a new method of tempering steel.
The Champion says in regard to it: ‘‘After
heating a piece of steel to a white heat, and
putting it in the tempering box, every ordinary
attempt to break it was unavailing, while on
the other hand, a piece of the same material,
tempered in the ordinary way, and with the
same effort to break it, was shivered in a dozen
piecss.’’ Mr. Jenkins has also patented a new
method of working serap-iron into certain
manufactured articles; at a saving, itis claimed,
of about 50 per cent. to the manutacturer,
A COPPER Vacuum pan was recently constructed for an English sugar refinery costing £2,500,
and being twelve aud one half feet in diameter
and thirteen feet deep. Init twenty-seven tons
of moist sugar could be boiled in two and one
half hours.
Tar Cambria Iron Company has opened a
nigbt-school in the Third ward, Johnstown, Pa.,
for the education of boys who are employed at
work inthe mines. A noble work, and one
that should be imitated everywhere.
The Curious in Nature.
In prsvious numhsrs of ths Press we have,
from time to tims, givsn illustrations and short
bits of natural history sstting forth the peculiar traits or habits of instinct or reason, call
it what we will, of some of the smallsr of the
animal creation, whsreby they are enabled to
construct their psculiar habitations or provids
themselves with food in some remarkable manner.
We have given the ant-lion; ants at homs;
carpsnter-bee; tailor-bird, ete., and now we
continne the series by introducing a short history of the
Archer Fish.
This littls fish, ssldom sxceeding six inches
in Isngth, is known to naturalists asthe Texotes
jaculator, found in some of the fresh waters of
Java and a fsw of ths other India islands. Its
appearance wonld indicate nothing rsmarkabls
except a slight peculiarity of form, compared
with most fishes. Bnt that which gives it
peculiar interest is the manner it procures its
food. It lives upon flies and othsr winged
insects that swarm among the aquatic plants of
the waters it inhahits.
Instead of leaping from the water for its
prey, which few fish can do to more than once
or twice their length above the surfacs, this littlo‘artillerist brings its mouth only to the surface
and there ejects orshoots, a single drop of water
from its throat and mouth, with unerring aim,
and with such force as to disable and knock
down into the water any fly or insect that—as
a sportsman would say—‘‘it draws a bead on,”
when it heoomes an easy prey.
The artillerist—for this is a more appropriate name than archer, as it uses neither bow
THE ARCHER,
nor arrow—is easily domesticated and seems to
delight in showing its powers, for which reason
itis often kept as a pet, in large open vases,
and loses no opportunity in throwing its ehot
at any unfortunate fly presenting itself, or
forced within its reach; its aim is almost unerring at any distance less than three feet, and
the effect perfectly stunning.
Biowpipe Analysis for Practical Men.
A very useful soheme for the qualitative determination of substances by the blowpipe has
been arranged by Prof. T. Ecueston, M. E., of
Columbia College School of Mines, New York,
aud published in the Americon Chemist. He
states that iu the course of his instructiou iu
blowpipe-analysis he formerly found great difficulty in teaching the students how to distinguish with certainty the substances contained
in a mixture of four or five ingredients, more
particularly when the most of these were metals.
The old routine method of examiuation on charcoal, then in the closed and open tube, etc.,
answered very well when not more than one or
two metals were present, but did not seem
to answer in the hands of beginners when
they came to examine alloys of complex composition. For a long time he was convinced
that it was quite useless to expect of a student
that he shonld be able, without extended practice, todetermine qualitatively, the composition
of a very complex substance. It finally suggested itself to him that a plan similar to the
one used in certain qnantitative assays would
answer for the general outline of qualitative
work. He, therefore, prepared a provisional
scheme, which, in order to test, he gave to students to-work with. The result of this scheme
convinced him that it was possible so to arrange one as to make it applicable to almost
any compound, either natnral or artificial, which
could be met with in ordinary working. He
therefore drew up a carefully prepared scheme,
which he modified from time to time, as cireumstances were suggested by its use in the Blowpipe Laboratory. The result was such that,
after afew months’ practice, he felt no hesitancy
in giving to the students at their final examination mixtures containing 21 substances, one of
which contained 12 different substances to be
determined. This scheme, with some slight
modifications, is the one which he is at present
using, It has been in constant use for three
years, and has effected an entire change in the
working of the laboratory, the students finding
great pleasure in what was before a subject of
constant uncertuiuty. He has published it in
hope that it may help to make the use of the
blowpipe in the determination of mixtures less
difficult than it appears to bs when it is approacbed without soms snch guide. He aoknowledges in the prsparation of the scheme
the valuable suggestions of his two assistants,
Mr. J. H. Caswell, and H. B. Cornwall, M.E.
Ths substancs may contain—
As. Se Cu Pb Au Cd Br §i0?
Sb. Fs Co Bi Hg SI I No
S.. Mn Ni Ag Zn Ci Co? Ho, eto.
1. Treat on charcoal in the oxidising flame to
find volatile substancss, such as arsenic, antimony, sulphur, selenium, lead, bismnth,
silver, zinc, oadminm, ete. (p. 86, et seq.)
a.—If there be volatile aubstances present,
form a coating, and test it with microcosmio
salt and tin on charcoal for antimony (p. 99) or
Boge eae bstween lead and bismuth (p,
6. — If thsrs bs no yolatile substancss pressnt, divide a part of the substance into three
portions and procsed as in A.
a@.—Yellow coat, yielding witb microcoemic salt a
black bead, disappearing witb blue flame, no part of it
yielding green Sb. flams, indicatee--Pb. and Bi.
b.—Yeliow coat. generally witb white border, yielding
black or grey bead, witb microcoamic salt disappearing
witb blue flame; aleo the border disappearing witb green
flame indicatee—Pb, and Sb,
¢.—Yellow coat, very eimilar to 6, but yielding no
blue flame, indicates—Bi, and Sb.
2.—IF ARSENIO, ANTIMONY, SULPHUR, OF SELENrumM be prssent, roast a lave quantity thoronghly on charcoal (p.77). Divide the snbstance into thres portions and procsed as in A.
A.—TreaTMent oF THE First Portion.
Dissolvs a very small quantity in borax on
platinum wire in the ordinary flame and observe
the eolor produced. Various colors will be
formsd by the combination of the oxides. Saturats the bead and shaks it off into ths porcelain
dish; repsat this once or twics (p. 79).
a.—Treat these beads on charcoal with a
small piece of lead, silver or gold, in a strong
reducing flame (p. 113).
b.—IRON, MANGANESE, OoBALT, etc., remain
in the bead (p. 115).
It the bead epread ont on charcoal, it must be collected to a globule by continued blowing.
Make a borax bead on platinum wire, and djasolve in it
some of the fragmenta of the bead, reeerving tbe reet for
accidenta.
¢.—NICKEL, COPPER, SILVER, GOLD, TIN, LEAD,
and RisMOTH are reduced and collected by the
lead-button (p. 115).
Remove tbe lead button from the bead while bot, or
by breaking tbe latter, when cold, on the anvil, between
paper, carefully preserving all the fragmente.
d.—If coranT be present, the bead will be
hlue.
If a large amount of raon be present, add a little borax
to prove the presence or abeence of COBALT (p. 222).
If MANGANESE be present, the bead when treated on
plattnum wire in tbe oxidieing flame will become dark
violet or black,
e.—If no conaxt be present, the bead will be
almost colorless.
Look bere for Cr, Ti, Mo, U, W, V and Ta.
f.—Treat the button ¢ on charcoal in the oxidising flame until all the lead, etc., is driven
off; NICKEL, COPPER, SILVER, GOLD remaining behind, or separate the lead with boracic acid
(p. 442).
g.—Treat the residue g on charcoal in oxidising flame with microcosmic salt bead, removing
the button while the bead is hot.
h.—lIf NICKEL AND coppEE be present, the
bead will be green when cold (p. 292). If
NICKEL only--yellow. If copper only—blue.
Prove copper by treating with tin on charcoal
in the reducing flame (p. 293).
i.—For smuver and gold, make the special
test No. 8.
B.—TResTMENT OF THE SECOND Portion.
Drive off the volatile substances in the oxidising flame on charecal. Treat with the reducing flame, or mix with soda, and then treat
with the reducing flame for zinc, capmiuM and
tin, If a white coating be formed, test with
cobalt solution (pp. 251, 256, 276).
C.—TREATMENT OF THE THIRD PoRTIon.
Dissolve some of the substance in microcosmic salt on platinum wire in the oxidising
flame, observing whether Si O’ he present or
not, and test for MANGANESE with nitrate of potassa (p. 210).
3.—Test for ansENIC with soda on charooal in
the reducing flame, or with dry soda in a closed
tube (p. 345, et. seq). 4.—Dissolve in microcosmic salt on platinum wire in the oxidising
flame (if the substance he not and do not contain any sulphur) and test for antimony on
charcoal, with tin iu the reducing flame (p.99).
5.—Test for sELENIUM on charcoal (p. 368).
6.—In absence of selenium fuse with soda in the
reducing flame, and test for suLpHUR on silverfoil (p. 865). In presence of selenium test
for eupaue in open tuhe (p. 366). 7.—Test
for MERCURY with dry sodain a closed tnbe
(p. 304).
8.—Mix some of the substance with assay
Jead and borax glass and fuse on charcoal in the
reducing flame (p 401). Cnpel the lead hntton
for stuver (p. 407). Test with nitrio acid for
GOLD p. 320).
9.—Test for CHLORINE, BRosINE and IoDINE,
with a bead of microcosmic salt saturated with
oxide of copper. 10.—Test for Cl. or Br with
bisalphate of potassa (p. 374). 11.—Test for
HO inaclosed tube (p. 353).—Test on platinum wire or in platinum pointed forceps for
coloration of the flame (p. 72, ef seg.). 138,—~
Test for CO? with hydrocblorio acid (p. 360).
14.—Test for NO5 with hisnlphate of potassa
(p. 354). 15.—Test for retnuR1vM in an open
tube (p. 351),
The numbers refer in all cases to Professor
Cornwall's translation of the last German edition of Plattner’s work. In the above the
the metals to be sought for are printed in smaLu
caprrazs, the heavier and dotted letters being
inconvenient for use in newspapers,