Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
California Indians, Historians, and Ethnographers (18 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 18

Mission San Gabriel (founded in 1771), as depicted in Alfred Robinson’s Life in California
(1839). Although their principal focus was usually on main religious buildings, illustrations
made by visitors to the Franciscan missions between the 1780s and the 1830s also made
visual records of Indian life. Like many others, this illustration demonstrates that mission
Indians did not assimilate colonial Spanish culture immediately and totally, but rather
blended traditional native ways with the new conquering culture. Decades after the
founding of missions, many neophytes continued to rely on native buildings (in the
illustration foreground), as well as on traditional clothing, foods, tools, arts, family and
clan systems, and religious rites. Evidence that the Indians were only partially assimilated
can also be found in written records and the artifacts uncovered by recent archaeological
excavations at mission sites. CHS/Ticor Collection, University of Southern California.
that some are in archives not easily accessible to
Californians cuts them off from the casual student,
but perhaps makes them all the more attractive to
the serious scholar. Some have been translated
and published; some are still waiting for the interested scholar. It must be said, however, that the
verdicts on the mission system will be ‘‘settled”
not only by the facts in the archives, but also by the
traditions, oral and written, handed down in the
families of California Indians whose ancestors were
brought up in the missions. It is from this kind of
source that some of the most severe criticisms of
the missions have come, although some such traditions contain appreciation as well as criticism.
Life at the missions after Mexican independence
during most of the 1820s went on much as it had
in the Spanish period, but there was a drastic
change in the 1830s, when the Mexican government “secularized” the missions, with control of
the mission lands given over to secular administrators who were supposed to be guardians for the
Indians. Within a few years, however, the Indians
were largely dispossessed, and their lands had
fallen into the hands of the so-called guardians and
their allies. Francisco Patencio, a Cahuilla leader
who in the early 1900s dictated an account of
Cahuilla history, tells of considerable turmoil among
the Indians during this period.* Other sources
describe the distress of people closely associated
with the missions, as secular non-Indians illegally
took possession of mission properties. For people
more distant from the missions, the severe impact
of Euro-American contact during and after the Gold
Rush of the late 1840s was yet to come. Despite the
turmoil in some areas, the period from the 1820s
through most of the 1840s was one toward which,
in the latter part of the century, most California
Indian people looked back with appreciation. For
FALL 1992 327