Search Nevada County Historical Archive
Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
To search for an exact phrase, use "double quotes", but only after trying without quotes. To exclude results with a specific word, add dash before the word. Example: -Word.

Collection: Directories and Documents > Tanis Thorne Native Californian & Nisenan Collection

A Case Study of a Northern California Indian Tribe - Cultural Change to 1860 (1977) (109 pages)

Go to the Archive Home
Go to Thumbnail View of this Item
Go to Single Page View of this Item
Download the Page Image
Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard
Don't highlight the search terms on the Image
Show the Page Image
Show the Image Page Text
Share this Page - Copy to the Clipboard
Reset View and Center Image
Zoom Out
Zoom In
Rotate Left
Rotate Right
Toggle Full Page View
Flip Image Horizontally
More Information About this Image
Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard
Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)
Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 109  
Loading...
The southern boundary line then crossed the headwaters of the North Fork of the Cosumnes River and followed the Middie Fork of the Cosumnes River and the Mokelumne River to the Sacramento River. The western boundary of the Nisenan nation ran north, following the Sacramento and Feather Rivers, and northeast above the North Fork of the Yuba River to the southern end of Sierra Valley.’ Kroeber refined Dixon's views on Nisenan political boundaries. Kroeber doubted that the eastern boundary of the Nisenan nation extended to the crest of the Sierra Nevada mountain range. Washo Indians had hunted west of the Sierras along the Stanislaus River and probably corssed the Sierras into Nisenan territory.° This thesis is supported by a notation in John C. Fremont's diary. -++.a party of Indians (probably Washo) passed them (Fremont's party) on snow shoes (in the South Lake Tahoe area) who said that they were going to the western side of the Sierra mountains to fish. Kroeber theorized that the southern boundary line of the Nisenan was delineated by an abrupt linguistic change. It did not follow the Mokelumne River to its junction with the Sacramento River, but linked a point on the Cosumnes River, ten miles downstream from the confluence of the Middle and North Forks of the Cosumnes River, toa point on the Sacramento River, four miles below the city of Sacramento. Kroeber also assumed that Nisenan occupied the tule marsh on both sides of the Sacramento River, five miles upstream from its junction with the Feather River to a point four miles below the city of Sacramento, 19 The tule marsh was permanently occupied only at natural mounds remaining above the spring run-off water line. Some valley Nisenan villages that were located next to tributaries of the Sacramento River, i.e., the village at Slough House on the Cosumnes River, were built on artificial mounds. ?2 Nisenan political boundaries remain controversial and not Subject to fixation. A map in the appendix of this text incorporates Dixon's and Kroeber's theses. The reader can now appreciate the general distribution of Nisenan territory before immigrant contact. The purpose of this thesis is to reveal systematically the nature of this interaction up to 1859,