June 4, 1937 (6 pages)

_@uent deadlocks between er hand, 3 grams and many leg islative proposmeu HOUSE LEGISLATURE? By RALPH H. TAYLOR . Did the movement for a one, heuse legislature in California gain fmpetus, or lose ground, as a result a ‘the partisan bickering and frethe two ipsisiative houses — the 1937 @eesions? The question is exceedingly pert-ipent at this time, as reportsqurrent that an effort. will to submit an initjative ac sto 4 fornia voters at the next “general election, designed to, establish a onehouse legislature. { At first glance, the fact that such @ move is contemplated would seem to indicate that he ‘Unicameral -SYStem is gaining new support and ‘has made definite headway. -On the othinquiry develops that anoxt of the new support for the scheme gomes from leftist ~ groups awnicn were’ unsnecessful im) jamming @hrough rafal and experimes}al legislative proposals during the séssion just drawing toa Close. SBS The other side of the -picture is that trends during the 1937 session ; revealed the inherent weaknesses ina one-house legislature system for a State such as California, where the single house would be dominated: and controlled by two or three large cities s, with rural and agricultural. areas Ajorfed effoetive renresentas . tion. And although the nied oval . plan donhtless gained new recruits from citv maleontents. opposition ue the plan from taxpayirg grouns. tar-. mers and rural districts has generally increased. if the plan is submitted to vote of the people, ft is possible that the almost unanimous disapproval of rural: areas, combined with the vote of city! taxpayers, fearful of letting down: the bars to extravagant spending and . legislative experimentation, would, He: sufficient to insure its defeat, al-. though ‘such a campaign would un-! doubtedly precipitate one of the hot-. Nevada City with his parents, Dr. test political battles in many vears. In rural counties, the ex™ression has ‘been commonly heard during resent months, ‘Thank God for the, Senate!” Such exclamations followed . defeat in the senate of millions of dollars worth of special appropria. is of the “pork barrel’’ variety, i rejection of one-sided Wrhar. . sr7als which were more visionary than @ractical. Yet it is unfair to con. demn all assemblymen as dthrifts or radicals. Some of agriculture’s finest champions were in the assembly, but the fact remains that on many issues tne e'tycontrolled assemb!y swept like a steam roller over the wishes-and desires of the minority members from rural districts. “Indicating the vital need of twe) live and sympathetic to the problems } ES, either .# legislative houses, with one res"onsof the producing areas, the assembly . (dominantly urban in its membership) evidenced the following unmistakable tendencies: First, unquestion‘ng. approval of anything. which earried the approval of organized labor, regardless of cost, need, fairness of workability. Second, a lavish hand in providing for the unfortunthe unemployed and indigent. without regard to that other “forgotten man’’—the fellow who pays the ADD PEOPLE Or n‘}is, Third, a disposition to cut city tax bills at the expense of _ rural areas. Repeal or reduction of the sales tax, for example, would have shunted a heavier burden onto the “armer and’ dther common proper‘y taxnayers. The senate, on the other hand— althouch the most progressive and liberal-upper house in many years— was more responsive to farmers and other producing groups, which -create he state’s wealth and «share the heaviest part of the. burden.of making the wheels go ’round. Mstricts,{ ‘where’ fa neutral laws has a ter ‘wise Shied away from meny.of the’ “lett turns” which appealed to urban assemblymen. “Tt it demonstrated Nine else; the 1987 legislature did serve to es_ tablish. that two -houses*-“are safer ithan one and that balance of power between urban and rural areas is essential, if the rights of both groups ‘are to be safeguarded. The partisan bickerings, although regrettable, was much preferable to the steamroll> which would have been orerated this year under a single to use: sys +em. WARREN CHAPMAN WILL SPEND FURLOUGH HERE The ‘menv “ends af* Wart-sn “Buzz’’ Chapman cadet at West Point, will be pleased to learn that he has a ten weeks furlough wh'c: starts at 11:40 June 12. He hadfew days vacation last year but it did not give him time to come home. He will spend much of his time in ‘and Mrs. C.W. Chapman. This wi!l! ‘be young tion for the next two years, Use Classified Advertising for your Small wants. Nugget Ads pay. With & *maiority of its members. from rural ‘arity. .we:h/ éney to temn:. -er Utopian theories, ‘the senate likeBLOODY TOLL OF Chapman’s longest. vaca. lives _as the result of highway acNEVADA atts NUGGET TRAFFIC CRASHES 4. — Califernia’s bloody record of automobile SACRAMENTO, June 4. dea hs still mounts, according to Ray Ingels, director of the state motor vehicle department, who points out that during the first four months of this year 964-persons lost thei~ cidents. In the first four months of 1936, Ingels said, 886 persons were killed in. collisions, while the same period this year shows an increase of 8.8 per cent. 5 Aecidents and their concomitants injuries, kept space with deaths, the director sa‘d, 8,972 accidents in 1937 accounting for 11,946 reportod injuries, aS against 8,058 accidents and 10,564 injuries last year, “Of the fatal accidents in which ‘the approximate speed was reported.” Director Insel declared, “it was discovered — that. everyone cf these in which mofe' than one person was isd ‘high speed was involved.” ee “fess M. M. Milward, of Auburn is npemiuk this week in Nevada City. visiting. her sister, Mrs. Leland Smith and family. How many times has a Headache ruined your day’s work— spoiled your evening's pleasure? Users of Alka-Seltzer say that AlkaSeltzer gives unusually prompt and effective relief from -<Headache. ‘Pry Alka-Seltzer for Acid Indigestion, bi site Rheumatic, and iatic AlkaSeltzer contains an for « fe" We vegetable and mineral -alkalisers acidity of ae weoniec ge Nevada City Dey Cleaners Call and Deliver HATS, SUITS, -DRESSES, CLOAKS DRY CLEANED AND PRESSED ALL WORK GUARANTEED 24 . Commercial Street Nevoie Ci Phone 510m temaint-incan ‘. erate OF’ (CALIFORNIA DEPAR DEPART““MENT OF “PUBLIC “WORKS” . DIVISION OF WATER eeteng APPROPRIATE WA NOTICE 3S ‘HEREBY GIVEN, that Ridge Mines, Inc.,-care of F.C. Homer, President, North San Juan Cali. ‘ornia, has under the-date of April 12 ot of 1937, applied to the Division Water Resources, Department for a permit to appropriate unaporopriated water, subject to existing rights. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Water to be appropriated -from Grizzly .Creek tributary to Middle Yuba River, County of Nevada. Amount applied for: 20 cubic feet per second. Diversion season named: January 1st to December 31st of each season. Water to be used for mining and domestic purposes. j Point of diversion within SW% of SEY% of Section 22, T 18 N, R 9 EB, M.D. B. & M. Place of use described: within SW% of SE% of Section 36, T 18 N. R 8 E, M.D. B. & M. Water -will be returned to Middle Yuba River in SEY of SE14 of Section 25, T 18 N, R 8 EF. M.D. B. & M. RELATIVE TO PROTESTS Blanks upon which to.submit protests will be suprlied free upon reguest by the Division of Water Resources. 2 aa Any person désiring to ~ protest aganist the granting of such permit shall within. Sixty days from date hereof file with the Division of Water Resources, Sacramento, California. a written protest. Such protest shall. clearly set forth the protestant’s objections to the granting of the avplication and shall contain the following information: (1) Statement of the injury which would result’ to protestant from:such approvriation and use. (2) The basis of protestant’s water. right. (3) Protestant’s past and present use of water both as to amount used and land irrigated, or use made of water if other than irrigation. (4) The approximate location of protestant’s land or place of use and point of.divers‘on of the water. A cory of the protest should be sent to the applicant and this office notified that the same has. been done. : EDWARD HYATT, State Bingineer. Dated: Sacramento, California, May 7. 1937. May 21, 28, June 4 and 11. NO. 6831. IN THE SUPBPRIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NEVADA. ’ .SUMMONS ROBERT G. STEGER, EMILY STEGER, THOMAS J. . HADDY and HAZEL A, HADDY, Plaintiffs, vs. TRYPHINA BONNEY, ANDREW GRISSEL, CARL T. LARSEN, ALBERTINA LARSEN, his wife, JAMES MARTIN TREWHELLA, CELIA JANE TREWHELLA. ROSE YOUNG, EDWARD PERRYMAN, ELLEN PERRYMAN, his wife, JONATHAN PASCOE and LILE PASCOE, his wife, and all other persons unknown ‘Claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real property described in the Complaint adverse to plaintiffs’ iffs’. title thereto. Defendants. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEND GREETING £'Q: Py pans BONNEY, ANDREW BONNEY, L. B. LITTLE, JOHN GRISSEL, ROBERT MORRISON, CARL LARSEN, ALBERTINA LARSEN, his wife, JAMES MARTIN TREWHELLA, ‘CELIA JANE TREWHELLA, ROSE YOUNG. EDWARD PERRYMAN, ELLEN PERRYMAN, his wife, JONATHAN PASCOE and LILE PASCOE, his wife, and all other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real property described i she Complaint adverse to plaintiffs’ ownership or any cloud upon plaintiffs’ title thereto, Defendants. YOU ARE HBEREBY DIRECTED TO APPEAR and answer the ComHE entitled as abo e, “*proueht against ‘you«in thé Super! Court of the County of Nevada. State of California, within ten (10) days after the service on you of this Summons, if served within this county, or within thirty (30) days if served elsewhere. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that unless you appear and answer ‘as: above requiréd, .said plaintiffs will take judgment for any money or damage demanded in this’ complaint, a8 arising upon contract oT it will apply to the Court for any other relief demanded in the complaint. This action is brought and the object thereof is, to quiet -the-title of plaintiffs to determine any and al] adverse claims to and clouds upon the title of plaintiffs.to the real property. described ‘in the complaint and to make the above named defendants and also all other persons unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real property described in the complaint adverse to the ownership of plaintiffs or any cloud upon the title of said plaintiffs, set forth the nature of their claim or claims, to the property hereinafter described, if any they have, and that such claim or claims be adjudged to be of no effect and void, and that title of plaintiffs to the same be quieted against them, and each of them, or as to any unknown. That said parcels of land are situated in the City of Nevada, County of Nevada, State of California, and more particularly described: : as follows: All that cael of ‘Lots Nine ( 9) Public Works, State of California, . BONNEY, L. B: LITTLE, JOHN) ROBERT. MORRISON, : ownership or any cloud upon plaint-. aan ee and Ten (10) in, Block Forty-six (46) of the City of otaaae said lots. and block are 4 ano ni the orf 1 map of levada, e by H. S:Btadiey Bs ‘the ‘year iB6D, bounded and more seg ly described as follows, to-wit: Commencing .at a poimt on the Easterly line of Zion Street. and loeated . South 19° 02’ West 96. 34 feet from the Northwesterly corner of said Lot “9; thence South 89° 29’ East 232.60 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 9, located South 3° 51’ West 90.15 feet from thie Northeasterly corner of said Lot 9; thence South 4° ‘27’ West 325.76 feet along the Eastérly line of said Lot 9, and the extension ‘thereof; thence South 2° 47’ East 11.51 feet ‘to a point in the Northerly line of Sacramento Street; thence ° South 69° 50° West 23.41 feet along the Northerly line of. ‘Saéramento Street; thence North 5° East 184.25 feet to a point; thence North 72° 19’ West 245.01 feet to a point on the Easterly line of Zion Street; ‘thence North 19° 35’ East 93.98 feet along the Easterly line of Zion Street to the point of commencement. All that portion of Lot Nine (9) of Block Forty-six (46) of the City of Nevada, as said-lot and block are designated upon the official map of the City of Nevada, made by H. S. Bradley in the year 1869, bounded and more particularly described -as follows, to-wit: Commenting at a point on the Easterly Jine of Zion Street located South -19° 02’ West 96.34 feet and South 19° 35’ West 93.98 feet from the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 9: thence South 72° 19 Bast 245.01 feet: thence South 5° “West 61 feet to a point;:thence North 71° 43° West 91.49 feet; thence North 72° 58’ West 172.05 feet to a point in the Easterly line of Zion Street: thence North 22° 23’ East 60.75 . , feet along the Easterly line of Zion Street to the po'nt of commencement. TOGETHER with an easement for a right of way over the following described property commencing at the northeast corner of the above described property S. 5° 00’ West 184.25 feet; thence North 69° 50’ E. 23.41 ‘feet; thence N. 2° 47’ W. 11.51 feet; thence N. .4° 27’ E. 180 feet more or less to a _ point located S. 72° 19’ East from point of commencement, thence N. 72° 19’ W. 20 feet more or less to the place of commencement. GIVEN under my hand and the seal of the Superior Court of the County of Nevada, State of. California, this-28th day of April, A387. (Seal) R: N. MeCORMACK, Clerk. Jones & Finnegan Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Nevada City, California. May 28, June 4, 11, 18. NO. 6824. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NEVADA. ANNIE ‘THOMAS MURCHIE, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD SANDOW; JAMES K. WILLIAMS; LESLIE C. WILLIAMS; REUBEN ALFRED WILLIAMS; ETHEL JOSEPHINE WILLIAMS; JOSHUA , CONOVER and FANNIE C. CONOVER, his wife: JENNIE . A. SCHROEDER: FRANK G. FINNEGAN, as administrator of the estate of Amelia A. James, also known as Annie A. ‘James, deceased; also all other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in -the real property described in the complaint adverse to plaintiff’s ownership, or any cloud upon plaintiff's title thereto, Defendants, SUMMONS. Action brought in the Superior of California, and the complaint filed in the office of the County Clerk of said county. NILON, HENNESSY & KELLY, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Grass Valley. California. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF GALIFORNIA SEND GREETING TO: RICHARD SANDOW; JAMES K. WILLIAMS; LFSLIE C. WILLIAMS: REUBEN ALFRED WILLIAMS: ETHEL JOSEPHINE WILLIAMS; JOSHUA CONOVER and FANNIE C. CONOVER, his wife: JENNIE A. SCHROEDER; and FRANK G. FINNEGAN, as administrator of the estate of Amelia A. James, also known as Annie A. James, deceased; also all ons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real property described in the complaint adverse to plaintiff's ownership, or any cloud upon plaintiff’s title thereto, Defendants. Your are hereby notified that an action has been commenced against you in the above-entitled Court by the above-entitled plaintiff for the purpose of determining all adverse claims to and clouds upon the title to all that certain real property situate in the City of Nevada, County of Nevada, State of California, and bounded and particularly described as follows, to wit: PARCEL 1: All thai portion of Lots numbered 5 and 6, in. Block numbered 56, of the City of-Nevada; as said Lots and Block are designated upon the Official Map of the said City of Nevada, made by H. 8S. Bradley in the year 1869, described as follows, viz.; Commencing at the-most Westerjsy corner, at the outer edge of: stone wall at lot front along the Southeast side of Sacramento Street. being North 54° East 1 foot from the original corner at Southeast side of Sacramento Street, common to Lots 5 and 6, of Block 56, Townsite of Nevada City; thence South 31° 15’ East 104 feet along old fence’ line to most Southerly corner at 3% feet Southeasterly from the Northeast corner of cabin on the Upper Murchie Lot extending from Prospect Street; thence North 54° East 80 feet to the most Wasterly corner; thence North 31° 15° West 104 feet to the most Northerly corner near foot of slope of steep bank .of hb ide at Southeast “side ‘of Sacramento Street; 2 aud . Court of the County of Nevada, State’ FRIDAY, JUNE 4, 1937. thenée South’ 54° West 80 feet along . stone wall at lot front along Southt. si i Boaal Sacra ento Street to the e. in in A ‘that portion ‘of Lot ed’ 5, ne ak ae numbered 56, City of Nevada,.as said Lot sk are designated upon the sea Map of the said City of Met made by H. S. Bradley in gi ¢ yéa: if “1869, ‘described ° as ‘{Ollows, “Commencing at the most Southerly corner on the Northwest side of Prospect Street, from which the original corner on the said Prospect Street common to Lots numbered 4 and 5, of Block numbered 56, of the Townsite of Nevada City, bears South 59° 18’ West 12 feet distant; ‘thence North 32° 13° West 51.2 feet to’most Westerly corner on stone wall along rear lot line; thence North 59° 20’ East 80 feet along said stone wall to most Northerly corner at 9 inches Northeast of Northwest corner of cabin; thence South 32° 13’ East 51.15 feet to most .Easterly corner at Northwest side. of Prospect Street, from which the original corner common to Lots numbered 5 and 6 of said Block numbered 56 on said Prospect Street bears North 59° 18’ East 9 feet distant, thence South 59° 18’ West 80 feet along Northwest side of Prospect Street to the place of beginning. You are hereby directed to appear and answer the complaint in an action .entitled as above .brought against you in the Superior Court of the County of Nevada, State of Cali‘fornia, within ten days after the service on you of this summons—if served within this county; or within thirty days if served elsewhere. And you are hereby notified that unless you appear and answer as above required, the said plaintiff will take*judgment for any money or damages demanded in the com‘plaint ‘as arising upon contract, or plaintiff will apply to the Court for any other relief demanded in the complaint. GIVEN: under my hand and the seal of the Superior Court of the County of Nevada, State of California, this 23d day of April; A. -D. 1937. : R.N. McCORMACK, Clerk, By: R. E. DEEBLE, Deputy Clerk. (SEAL) May 21, 28, June 4, TES; MENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES ; SACRAMENTO NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO APPROPRIATE WATER Application 8942 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that Ridge Mines, Inc., care of F. C. Homer, President, North San Juan, Cali‘ornia, has under the date of April 12. 1937, anplied to the Division of Water Resources, Department of Public Works, State of California, for a permit to appropriate unappropriated water, subject to existing rights. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Water to be appropriated from Spring Creek and branches, tributary to South Yuba River, County of Nevada. Amount applied for: per second. Diversion season named: November Ist to June 30th of each season. Water to be used for mining and domestic purposes. Point of diversion within SwW4 of NE% of Seetion 33, T 18 N, R 9 E, M. D. B. & M. NEY of SE\% of Section 33, T 18 N, R 9 E. M. D. B. & M. NW% of NW. of Section 3, T 17 N, R 9 B, M. D. B. & M. Place of use described: Portion of mineral lot No. 49 in SwW% of NEY of Section 1. T 17 N, R 8 E, M‘ D. B. & M. Water will be returned to Middle Yuba River in SEY of SEY of Section 25, T 18 N, R 8 E, M.-D, B. & M. RELATIVE TO PROTESTS Blanks upon which to submit protests will be supplied free upon request by the Division of Water Resources. Any person desiring to protest against the granting of such permit shall within. Sixry days from date hereof file with the Division of Water Resour.s, Sacramento, California, a written protest. Such protest shall clearly set forth the protestant’s.ebjections to the granting of the application and shall contain the following information: 15 cubic feet would result to protestant from such appropriation and use. (2) The basis-of protestant’ s water right. (3) Protestant’s past and present use of water both as to amount used and land irrigated, or use made of water if other than irrigation. (4) The approximate location of protestant’s land or place of use and point of diversion of the water. A copy of the protest should be sent to the applicant and this office notified that the same has been done. EDWARD HYATT, State Engineer. Dated: Sacramento, California, May 7, 1937. May 21, 28, June 4 and 11. $150 1, $250 : te t Desirable, Economical Comfortable, Convenient * AT. O’FARRELL SAN FRANCISCO -4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPART(1) Statement of the injury, which. 161 PoweELvt a #-

_@uent deadlocks between er hand, 3 grams and many leg islative proposmeu HOUSE LEGISLATURE? By RALPH H. TAYLOR . Did the movement for a one, heuse legislature in California gain fmpetus, or lose ground, as a result a ‘the partisan bickering and frethe two ipsisiative houses — the 1937 @eesions? The question is exceedingly pert-ipent at this time, as reportsqurrent that an effort. will to submit an initjative ac sto 4 fornia voters at the next “general election, designed to, establish a onehouse legislature. { At first glance, the fact that such @ move is contemplated would seem to indicate that he ‘Unicameral -SYStem is gaining new support and ‘has made definite headway. -On the othinquiry develops that anoxt of the new support for the scheme gomes from leftist ~ groups awnicn were’ unsnecessful im) jamming @hrough rafal and experimes}al legislative proposals during the séssion just drawing toa Close. SBS The other side of the -picture is that trends during the 1937 session ; revealed the inherent weaknesses ina one-house legislature system for a State such as California, where the single house would be dominated: and controlled by two or three large cities s, with rural and agricultural. areas Ajorfed effoetive renresentas . tion. And although the nied oval . plan donhtless gained new recruits from citv maleontents. opposition ue the plan from taxpayirg grouns. tar-. mers and rural districts has generally increased. if the plan is submitted to vote of the people, ft is possible that the almost unanimous disapproval of rural: areas, combined with the vote of city! taxpayers, fearful of letting down: the bars to extravagant spending and . legislative experimentation, would, He: sufficient to insure its defeat, al-. though ‘such a campaign would un-! doubtedly precipitate one of the hot-. Nevada City with his parents, Dr. test political battles in many vears. In rural counties, the ex™ression has ‘been commonly heard during resent months, ‘Thank God for the, Senate!” Such exclamations followed . defeat in the senate of millions of dollars worth of special appropria. is of the “pork barrel’’ variety, i rejection of one-sided Wrhar. . sr7als which were more visionary than @ractical. Yet it is unfair to con. demn all assemblymen as dthrifts or radicals. Some of agriculture’s finest champions were in the assembly, but the fact remains that on many issues tne e'tycontrolled assemb!y swept like a steam roller over the wishes-and desires of the minority members from rural districts. “Indicating the vital need of twe) live and sympathetic to the problems } ES, either .# legislative houses, with one res"onsof the producing areas, the assembly . (dominantly urban in its membership) evidenced the following unmistakable tendencies: First, unquestion‘ng. approval of anything. which earried the approval of organized labor, regardless of cost, need, fairness of workability. Second, a lavish hand in providing for the unfortunthe unemployed and indigent. without regard to that other “forgotten man’’—the fellow who pays the ADD PEOPLE Or n‘}is, Third, a disposition to cut city tax bills at the expense of _ rural areas. Repeal or reduction of the sales tax, for example, would have shunted a heavier burden onto the “armer and’ dther common proper‘y taxnayers. The senate, on the other hand— althouch the most progressive and liberal-upper house in many years— was more responsive to farmers and other producing groups, which -create he state’s wealth and «share the heaviest part of the. burden.of making the wheels go ’round. Mstricts,{ ‘where’ fa neutral laws has a ter ‘wise Shied away from meny.of the’ “lett turns” which appealed to urban assemblymen. “Tt it demonstrated Nine else; the 1987 legislature did serve to es_ tablish. that two -houses*-“are safer ithan one and that balance of power between urban and rural areas is essential, if the rights of both groups ‘are to be safeguarded. The partisan bickerings, although regrettable, was much preferable to the steamroll> which would have been orerated this year under a single to use: sys +em. WARREN CHAPMAN WILL SPEND FURLOUGH HERE The ‘menv “ends af* Wart-sn “Buzz’’ Chapman cadet at West Point, will be pleased to learn that he has a ten weeks furlough wh'c: starts at 11:40 June 12. He hadfew days vacation last year but it did not give him time to come home. He will spend much of his time in ‘and Mrs. C.W. Chapman. This wi!l! ‘be young tion for the next two years, Use Classified Advertising for your Small wants. Nugget Ads pay. With & *maiority of its members. from rural ‘arity. .we:h/ éney to temn:. -er Utopian theories, ‘the senate likeBLOODY TOLL OF Chapman’s longest. vaca. lives _as the result of highway acNEVADA atts NUGGET TRAFFIC CRASHES 4. — Califernia’s bloody record of automobile SACRAMENTO, June 4. dea hs still mounts, according to Ray Ingels, director of the state motor vehicle department, who points out that during the first four months of this year 964-persons lost thei~ cidents. In the first four months of 1936, Ingels said, 886 persons were killed in. collisions, while the same period this year shows an increase of 8.8 per cent. 5 Aecidents and their concomitants injuries, kept space with deaths, the director sa‘d, 8,972 accidents in 1937 accounting for 11,946 reportod injuries, aS against 8,058 accidents and 10,564 injuries last year, “Of the fatal accidents in which ‘the approximate speed was reported.” Director Insel declared, “it was discovered — that. everyone cf these in which mofe' than one person was isd ‘high speed was involved.” ee “fess M. M. Milward, of Auburn is npemiuk this week in Nevada City. visiting. her sister, Mrs. Leland Smith and family. How many times has a Headache ruined your day’s work— spoiled your evening's pleasure? Users of Alka-Seltzer say that AlkaSeltzer gives unusually prompt and effective relief from -<Headache. ‘Pry Alka-Seltzer for Acid Indigestion, bi site Rheumatic, and iatic AlkaSeltzer contains an for « fe" We vegetable and mineral -alkalisers acidity of ae weoniec ge Nevada City Dey Cleaners Call and Deliver HATS, SUITS, -DRESSES, CLOAKS DRY CLEANED AND PRESSED ALL WORK GUARANTEED 24 . Commercial Street Nevoie Ci Phone 510m temaint-incan ‘. erate OF’ (CALIFORNIA DEPAR DEPART““MENT OF “PUBLIC “WORKS” . DIVISION OF WATER eeteng APPROPRIATE WA NOTICE 3S ‘HEREBY GIVEN, that Ridge Mines, Inc.,-care of F.C. Homer, President, North San Juan Cali. ‘ornia, has under the-date of April 12 ot of 1937, applied to the Division Water Resources, Department for a permit to appropriate unaporopriated water, subject to existing rights. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Water to be appropriated -from Grizzly .Creek tributary to Middle Yuba River, County of Nevada. Amount applied for: 20 cubic feet per second. Diversion season named: January 1st to December 31st of each season. Water to be used for mining and domestic purposes. j Point of diversion within SW% of SEY% of Section 22, T 18 N, R 9 EB, M.D. B. & M. Place of use described: within SW% of SE% of Section 36, T 18 N. R 8 E, M.D. B. & M. Water -will be returned to Middle Yuba River in SEY of SE14 of Section 25, T 18 N, R 8 EF. M.D. B. & M. RELATIVE TO PROTESTS Blanks upon which to.submit protests will be suprlied free upon reguest by the Division of Water Resources. 2 aa Any person désiring to ~ protest aganist the granting of such permit shall within. Sixty days from date hereof file with the Division of Water Resources, Sacramento, California. a written protest. Such protest shall. clearly set forth the protestant’s objections to the granting of the avplication and shall contain the following information: (1) Statement of the injury which would result’ to protestant from:such approvriation and use. (2) The basis of protestant’s water. right. (3) Protestant’s past and present use of water both as to amount used and land irrigated, or use made of water if other than irrigation. (4) The approximate location of protestant’s land or place of use and point of.divers‘on of the water. A cory of the protest should be sent to the applicant and this office notified that the same has. been done. : EDWARD HYATT, State Bingineer. Dated: Sacramento, California, May 7. 1937. May 21, 28, June 4 and 11. NO. 6831. IN THE SUPBPRIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NEVADA. ’ .SUMMONS ROBERT G. STEGER, EMILY STEGER, THOMAS J. . HADDY and HAZEL A, HADDY, Plaintiffs, vs. TRYPHINA BONNEY, ANDREW GRISSEL, CARL T. LARSEN, ALBERTINA LARSEN, his wife, JAMES MARTIN TREWHELLA, CELIA JANE TREWHELLA. ROSE YOUNG, EDWARD PERRYMAN, ELLEN PERRYMAN, his wife, JONATHAN PASCOE and LILE PASCOE, his wife, and all other persons unknown ‘Claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real property described in the Complaint adverse to plaintiffs’ iffs’. title thereto. Defendants. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEND GREETING £'Q: Py pans BONNEY, ANDREW BONNEY, L. B. LITTLE, JOHN GRISSEL, ROBERT MORRISON, CARL LARSEN, ALBERTINA LARSEN, his wife, JAMES MARTIN TREWHELLA, ‘CELIA JANE TREWHELLA, ROSE YOUNG. EDWARD PERRYMAN, ELLEN PERRYMAN, his wife, JONATHAN PASCOE and LILE PASCOE, his wife, and all other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real property described i she Complaint adverse to plaintiffs’ ownership or any cloud upon plaintiffs’ title thereto, Defendants. YOU ARE HBEREBY DIRECTED TO APPEAR and answer the ComHE entitled as abo e, “*proueht against ‘you«in thé Super! Court of the County of Nevada. State of California, within ten (10) days after the service on you of this Summons, if served within this county, or within thirty (30) days if served elsewhere. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that unless you appear and answer ‘as: above requiréd, .said plaintiffs will take judgment for any money or damage demanded in this’ complaint, a8 arising upon contract oT it will apply to the Court for any other relief demanded in the complaint. This action is brought and the object thereof is, to quiet -the-title of plaintiffs to determine any and al] adverse claims to and clouds upon the title of plaintiffs.to the real property. described ‘in the complaint and to make the above named defendants and also all other persons unknown, claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real property described in the complaint adverse to the ownership of plaintiffs or any cloud upon the title of said plaintiffs, set forth the nature of their claim or claims, to the property hereinafter described, if any they have, and that such claim or claims be adjudged to be of no effect

and void, and that title of plaintiffs to the same be quieted against them, and each of them, or as to any unknown. That said parcels of land are situated in the City of Nevada, County of Nevada, State of California, and more particularly described: : as follows: All that cael of ‘Lots Nine ( 9) Public Works, State of California, . BONNEY, L. B: LITTLE, JOHN) ROBERT. MORRISON, : ownership or any cloud upon plaint-. aan ee and Ten (10) in, Block Forty-six (46) of the City of otaaae said lots. and block are 4 ano ni the orf 1 map of levada, e by H. S:Btadiey Bs ‘the ‘year iB6D, bounded and more seg ly described as follows, to-wit: Commencing .at a poimt on the Easterly line of Zion Street. and loeated . South 19° 02’ West 96. 34 feet from the Northwesterly corner of said Lot “9; thence South 89° 29’ East 232.60 feet to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 9, located South 3° 51’ West 90.15 feet from thie Northeasterly corner of said Lot 9; thence South 4° ‘27’ West 325.76 feet along the Eastérly line of said Lot 9, and the extension ‘thereof; thence South 2° 47’ East 11.51 feet ‘to a point in the Northerly line of Sacramento Street; thence ° South 69° 50° West 23.41 feet along the Northerly line of. ‘Saéramento Street; thence North 5° East 184.25 feet to a point; thence North 72° 19’ West 245.01 feet to a point on the Easterly line of Zion Street; ‘thence North 19° 35’ East 93.98 feet along the Easterly line of Zion Street to the point of commencement. All that portion of Lot Nine (9) of Block Forty-six (46) of the City of Nevada, as said-lot and block are designated upon the official map of the City of Nevada, made by H. S. Bradley in the year 1869, bounded and more particularly described -as follows, to-wit: Commenting at a point on the Easterly Jine of Zion Street located South -19° 02’ West 96.34 feet and South 19° 35’ West 93.98 feet from the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 9: thence South 72° 19 Bast 245.01 feet: thence South 5° “West 61 feet to a point;:thence North 71° 43° West 91.49 feet; thence North 72° 58’ West 172.05 feet to a point in the Easterly line of Zion Street: thence North 22° 23’ East 60.75 . , feet along the Easterly line of Zion Street to the po'nt of commencement. TOGETHER with an easement for a right of way over the following described property commencing at the northeast corner of the above described property S. 5° 00’ West 184.25 feet; thence North 69° 50’ E. 23.41 ‘feet; thence N. 2° 47’ W. 11.51 feet; thence N. .4° 27’ E. 180 feet more or less to a _ point located S. 72° 19’ East from point of commencement, thence N. 72° 19’ W. 20 feet more or less to the place of commencement. GIVEN under my hand and the seal of the Superior Court of the County of Nevada, State of. California, this-28th day of April, A387. (Seal) R: N. MeCORMACK, Clerk. Jones & Finnegan Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Nevada City, California. May 28, June 4, 11, 18. NO. 6824. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NEVADA. ANNIE ‘THOMAS MURCHIE, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD SANDOW; JAMES K. WILLIAMS; LESLIE C. WILLIAMS; REUBEN ALFRED WILLIAMS; ETHEL JOSEPHINE WILLIAMS; JOSHUA , CONOVER and FANNIE C. CONOVER, his wife: JENNIE . A. SCHROEDER: FRANK G. FINNEGAN, as administrator of the estate of Amelia A. James, also known as Annie A. ‘James, deceased; also all other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in -the real property described in the complaint adverse to plaintiff’s ownership, or any cloud upon plaintiff's title thereto, Defendants, SUMMONS. Action brought in the Superior of California, and the complaint filed in the office of the County Clerk of said county. NILON, HENNESSY & KELLY, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Grass Valley. California. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF GALIFORNIA SEND GREETING TO: RICHARD SANDOW; JAMES K. WILLIAMS; LFSLIE C. WILLIAMS: REUBEN ALFRED WILLIAMS: ETHEL JOSEPHINE WILLIAMS; JOSHUA CONOVER and FANNIE C. CONOVER, his wife: JENNIE A. SCHROEDER; and FRANK G. FINNEGAN, as administrator of the estate of Amelia A. James, also known as Annie A. James, deceased; also all ons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real property described in the complaint adverse to plaintiff's ownership, or any cloud upon plaintiff’s title thereto, Defendants. Your are hereby notified that an action has been commenced against you in the above-entitled Court by the above-entitled plaintiff for the purpose of determining all adverse claims to and clouds upon the title to all that certain real property situate in the City of Nevada, County of Nevada, State of California, and bounded and particularly described as follows, to wit: PARCEL 1: All thai portion of Lots numbered 5 and 6, in. Block numbered 56, of the City of-Nevada; as said Lots and Block are designated upon the Official Map of the said City of Nevada, made by H. 8S. Bradley in the year 1869, described as follows, viz.; Commencing at the-most Westerjsy corner, at the outer edge of: stone wall at lot front along the Southeast side of Sacramento Street. being North 54° East 1 foot from the original corner at Southeast side of Sacramento Street, common to Lots 5 and 6, of Block 56, Townsite of Nevada City; thence South 31° 15’ East 104 feet along old fence’ line to most Southerly corner at 3% feet Southeasterly from the Northeast corner of cabin on the Upper Murchie Lot extending from Prospect Street; thence North 54° East 80 feet to the most Wasterly corner; thence North 31° 15° West 104 feet to the most Northerly corner near foot of slope of steep bank .of hb ide at Southeast “side ‘of Sacramento Street; 2 aud . Court of the County of Nevada, State’ FRIDAY, JUNE 4, 1937. thenée South’ 54° West 80 feet along . stone wall at lot front along Southt. si i Boaal Sacra ento Street to the e. in in A ‘that portion ‘of Lot ed’ 5, ne ak ae numbered 56, City of Nevada,.as said Lot sk are designated upon the sea Map of the said City of Met made by H. S. Bradley in gi ¢ yéa: if “1869, ‘described ° as ‘{Ollows, “Commencing at the most Southerly corner on the Northwest side of Prospect Street, from which the original corner on the said Prospect Street common to Lots numbered 4 and 5, of Block numbered 56, of the Townsite of Nevada City, bears South 59° 18’ West 12 feet distant; ‘thence North 32° 13° West 51.2 feet to’most Westerly corner on stone wall along rear lot line; thence North 59° 20’ East 80 feet along said stone wall to most Northerly corner at 9 inches Northeast of Northwest corner of cabin; thence South 32° 13’ East 51.15 feet to most .Easterly corner at Northwest side. of Prospect Street, from which the original corner common to Lots numbered 5 and 6 of said Block numbered 56 on said Prospect Street bears North 59° 18’ East 9 feet distant, thence South 59° 18’ West 80 feet along Northwest side of Prospect Street to the place of beginning. You are hereby directed to appear and answer the complaint in an action .entitled as above .brought against you in the Superior Court of the County of Nevada, State of Cali‘fornia, within ten days after the service on you of this summons—if served within this county; or within thirty days if served elsewhere. And you are hereby notified that unless you appear and answer as above required, the said plaintiff will take*judgment for any money or damages demanded in the com‘plaint ‘as arising upon contract, or plaintiff will apply to the Court for any other relief demanded in the complaint. GIVEN: under my hand and the seal of the Superior Court of the County of Nevada, State of California, this 23d day of April; A. -D. 1937. : R.N. McCORMACK, Clerk, By: R. E. DEEBLE, Deputy Clerk. (SEAL) May 21, 28, June 4, TES; MENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES ; SACRAMENTO NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO APPROPRIATE WATER Application 8942 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that Ridge Mines, Inc., care of F. C. Homer, President, North San Juan, Cali‘ornia, has under the date of April 12. 1937, anplied to the Division of Water Resources, Department of Public Works, State of California, for a permit to appropriate unappropriated water, subject to existing rights. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Water to be appropriated from Spring Creek and branches, tributary to South Yuba River, County of Nevada. Amount applied for: per second. Diversion season named: November Ist to June 30th of each season. Water to be used for mining and domestic purposes. Point of diversion within SwW4 of NE% of Seetion 33, T 18 N, R 9 E, M. D. B. & M. NEY of SE\% of Section 33, T 18 N, R 9 E. M. D. B. & M. NW% of NW. of Section 3, T 17 N, R 9 B, M. D. B. & M. Place of use described: Portion of mineral lot No. 49 in SwW% of NEY of Section 1. T 17 N, R 8 E, M‘ D. B. & M. Water will be returned to Middle Yuba River in SEY of SEY of Section 25, T 18 N, R 8 E, M.-D, B. & M. RELATIVE TO PROTESTS Blanks upon which to submit protests will be supplied free upon request by the Division of Water Resources. Any person desiring to protest against the granting of such permit shall within. Sixry days from date hereof file with the Division of Water Resour.s, Sacramento, California, a written protest. Such protest shall clearly set forth the protestant’s.ebjections to the granting of the application and shall contain the following information: 15 cubic feet would result to protestant from such appropriation and use. (2) The basis-of protestant’ s water right. (3) Protestant’s past and present use of water both as to amount used and land irrigated, or use made of water if other than irrigation. (4) The approximate location of protestant’s land or place of use and point of diversion of the water. A copy of the protest should be sent to the applicant and this office notified that the same has been done. EDWARD HYATT, State Engineer. Dated: Sacramento, California, May 7, 1937. May 21, 28, June 4 and 11. $150 1, $250 : te t Desirable, Economical Comfortable, Convenient * AT. O’FARRELL SAN FRANCISCO -4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPART(1) Statement of the injury, which. 161 PoweELvt a #-