Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Volume 032-4 - October 1978 (8 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 8

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE
PREHISTORY OF NEVADA COUNTY
_~
The human history of Nevada
County goes far back in time, long
before the well publicized activities of
the gold miners in the 1840’s and
1850's. The specific date for the entry of
the first Indian groups into Nevada
County is unknown. On-going
archaeological investigations,
primarily in and near the eastern end of
the county, suggest Native Americans
had been utilizing the areas in and
around Truckee and Lake Tahoe for
possibly six thousand years. A more
conservative and broadly accepted
time frame places the prehistoric
residents in the county by approximately three thousand years ago. Regardless
of the exact date, Indian peoples have
been in the county and surrounding
areas for a significant period of time.
Information about the early Nevada
County Indians comes from three major
sources: archaeology, ethnography, and
history. Archaeology is the study of the
past based on the physical objects and
other evidence left by human activity.
This study involves, among other
things, an analysis of the actions of
previous peoples by the examination of
artifacts they made or used. Ethnography is the study of living individuals
or groups of peoples in order to learn
mmgbout their specific cultural adaptations
: ‘nd practices. History is the study of
written records and other data which
bring out information about recorded
activities and events. Evidence from all
three sources is available for an
examination of the Indians of Nevada
County.
The pattern of prehistoric human
activity in Nevada County will never be
completely known, but data from the
above three sources allow for some
basic statements and observations.
The bibliography at the end of this
article lista the major publications
dealing with the prehistory of Nevada
and surrounding counties. The serious
student is referred to these sources for
an in-depth examination of county and
area prehistory.
I commend to your attention
particularly the works of A.L. Kroeber,
Beals, Downs, and Wilson and Towne.
These authors thoroughly record and
document the lifestyles of the Nevada
County native Indian peoples. It is not
the purpose of this article to repeat the
information they have gathered and
written. It is my intention to provide a
brief, general introduction to county
prehistory. Specific activities and
adaptations may be found in the works
cited.
Different environments provide
iffering opportunities and limitations.
erefore, Indian lifestyles are variable
aroughtout the New World. No
tandard set of beliefs, customs, or
behaviors were common to all American
Indians. To fully know a native
American group one must ignore
By Michael Claytor
stereotypes and search out the unique
environment and cultural practices of a
specific people. Thus it bears stating
that the Indians of Nevada County did
not hunt buffalo, smoke peace pipes, or
take scalps. Rather they lived a peaceful
life in close contact and harmony with
their land. They moved easily and
comfortably though a world they knew
and appreciated. Cultural appreciation
requires the recognition of human
variability in both custom and
appearance.
The first evidence of human
occupation in Nevada County is
associated with the Martis Complex
(Elsasser 1960). The term is used by
archaeologists to refer to the earliest
peoples and their cultural patterns in
the local area. This broadly based
cultural expression is found throughout
the northern Sierra on both sides of the
range. It is sufficient for our purposes to
point out that these peoples were
hunters end gatherers who utilized the
natural resources of. the Sierra on a
seasonal basis, primarily from spring
through fall. They moved in small
groups in pursuit of plants, animals, and
fish and other natural resources.
Evidence of Martis activities exists
largely in the form of stone tools, their
flaked stone projectile points, drills,
and scrapers and their ground stone seed
processing tools such as the mano and
metate. The Martis Compiex is
tentatively dated at from 1000 B.C. to
about A.D. 500 (Elston 1971: 136-137).
Whether the Martis peoples were
ancestral to the later Indians of the
county is not positively known at this
time. It is possible the Washo are their
descendents. No evidence of Martis
language remains and the extent of
their cultural patterns is still under
study.
Martis activity apparently predated the bow and arrow. The spear
thrower, or atlatl, was used to propel
wooden shafts through the air. The
bow was a later introduction.
At the time of the initial EuroAmerican entry into Nevada County,
the area was home for two Indian tribal
groups. West of the Sierra crest, along
the drainage systems of the Yuba and
Bear Rivers, lived the Nisenan. The
land to the east, along the tributaries of
the Truckee River, was claimed by the
Washo. The area at the Sierra crest
contained no permanent villages and
was probably utilized seasonally by
both groups in their pursuit of food and
other raw materials (Beals 1933: 336).
The Nisenan, occasionally called
the Southern Maidu, were situated
along the western slope of the Sierra in
the Yuba, Bear, and American River
. drainages. Their territory extended
from the Sacramento River in the west
to the summit of the Sierra in the east.
The Nisenan spoke a dialect of the
Maidu language which is thought to be
connected with the larger Penutian
language family. Other Maidu language
dialects included Konkow, spoken in
the Chico area, Northeastern Maidu,
spoken in the Quincy area. Most Indian
groups of the interior central
California area belonged to the
Penutian language family, including
the Wintu, Patwin, Miwok, and Yokuts.
The Washo of the eastern end of
Nevada County were Hokan speakers,
linguistically quite different from the
Nisenan. Washo nuclear territory was
located further east, focused on the
Carson Valley region of Nevada. Lake
Tahoe was a central feature of Washo
territory, though used seasonally, and
the Hokan speaking group was
distributed along the eastern Sierra,
north, east, and south of this important
place.
The Nisenan and Washo differed
culturally as well as linguistically,
although both were considered as
hunters and gatherers. Neither group
raised domestic food crops and the dog
was the only domesticated animal.
Foods were secured from the
environment using a totally stone-age
technology. Relying on natural foods
from the environment required a
complex technology and a flexible life
style, inasmuch as different foods
became seasonally .available over a
wide area, requiring frequent trips of
variable length.
Among the Nisenan and Washo it
seems likely that plant resources
provided the bulk of the aboriginal diet,
supplemented by large and small game,
fish, birds, and insects. The staple of
the Nisenan was the acorn, which was
gathered in the fall. The black oak
(Quercus Kelloggii) was the favored
species and provided the bulk of the
local acorn crop (Beals 1933). Oak trees
in Nevada County grow to an elevation
of approximately 6000 feet and are not
found in the eastern part of the county.
The Washo, thus sought another plant
staple, the nut from the Pinyon (Pinus
monophylia). Pinyon nuts were also
secured during the fall but the Washo
had to journey further east into Nevada
to secure sufficient quantities to
support them through the cold eastern
Sierra winters. Both acorns and pinyon
nuts were stored for later use.
The range of foods secured from
the environment was broad and
starvation was uncommon because of
the wide range of possible alternatives.
Duncan, speaking of the Nisenan,
states they “utilized as food virtually
every edible plant that grew in their
area” (1968:80). The Washo similarily
knew their territory and its food
resources.
Due to a more gentle climate and
greater food resources, the Nisenan in
the western end of Nevada County had
a greater population density than the
Washo to the east. Exact figures are not
27.