Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Volume 033-2 - April 1979 (10 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 10

These writers are Elisabeth Egenhoff
and Otis E. Young’. According to them,
the Cornish beam pumping engine as it
is officially called, literally made
possible deep mining in Europe as well
as in North and South America. As
Young states, this pumping engine and
the underground pumps which were
connected to it:
“\.gave birth to the Iron Age,
supplied it with materials, and died
out only when the Age itself was
about to pass away. Like the
cockroach, it was very humble but
very enduring’’,
In simplest terms, the Cornish
' system consisted of four major parts:
one, a pumping engine (prime mover);
two, a bell crank or “bob” for changing
direction of pump rods; three, the pump
rods, located in the mine itself; and
four, a series of push and lift pumps
attached to the rods to raise the water
(see illustration no. 3).7 The pumping
engine was thus only part of this
complex system. While it was the most
visible, it was not necessarily the most
important element of the aggregate.
In their first applications, Cornish
pumps were powered by steam.
According to Young, their operation
was based on the fundamental
theoretical work of Hero of Alexandria
and the French scientist Denis Papin.
The actual task of developing working
engines on this early theoretical base
was accomplished by Thomas Savery
(1650?-1715), Thomas Newcomen
(1663-1729) and James Watt (17361819). In Savery’s design, steam was
admitted directly into the cylinder of
the pump; the water acted as the piston.
The pumping action was achieved by
admitting the steam (pushing the water
out) and condensing the steam (sucking
the water up) in alternating fashion.
CROWN WHEEL OF CORNISH PUMP
BEING MOVED TO MUSEUM SITE.
10 PHOTO BY MICHAEL HALE.
DJ iéouJryyy Ye
WHA Z, Z
©
‘4 Yj ‘t)
tify
UY};
WH ;
4 Lig
NS 4
1640 fe.
\
\\
\\
nls 3
oe
uN
SAQA
SV Ss
MQ
4
eRe TT Fae
ILLUSTRATION #3. TOP AND SIDE VIEWS OF CORNISH PUMP OF SAME KIND AS PHOENIX.
SHOWS “BOBS” AND PUMP RODS AS NORMALLY CONNECTED. PHOTO SOURCE: HANS BEHR,
“MINE DRAINAGE, PUMPS ETC.”*
*SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA STATE MINING BUREAU, BULLETIN NO. 9, AUGUST 1896. See
pp. 40-60.
Newcomen built upon what Savery
had accomplished. He contributed the
valuable principle that the generation
of power could more efficiently be done
when separated from the actual
working of the pump. As Young put it:
‘*...that radically different
operations were best performed by
specialized machinery or, to putitin
the other way, that an all purpose
“system (such as that of Savery)
performed none of its functions
very well.’’8
Young claims that Watt should be
credited with two major developments
which greatly expanded the usefulness
of the Cornish pumping system. The
first came because Newcomen’s system
used large quantities of water to cool
the main steam cylinder, thus wasting
much fuel in the successive heating and
cooling off of the cylinder which his
system required. Watt corrected this by
installing a condensor and saved thus
much valuable fuel which had
previously been wasted heating the
eylinder. He further separated the
condensing and vacuum phase of the
operation, thus obtaining a wider
range between highest and lowest
steam pressure, which increased the
power generated. After achieving a
measure of financial success™
converting old Newcomen engines ana
installing new ones of his own design/
Watt also developed a completely new
engine. According to Young, this
engine involved: