Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Volume 036-4 - October 1982 (8 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 8

FROM THE LITERATURE
Doris Foley, The Searls Historical Library.
Sierra Heritage; Vol. 2; Nr. 1; pp. 8-10;
Summer 1982.
A brief history of Niles, Fred and Carroll
Searls, three generations of lawyers in
Nevada City. After having served as a law
office for almost a century, the Searls law
office was presented to the Nevada County
Historical Society to be converted into a
research library for the Society. A brief
description of the research sources of the
Searls Library is included. Also included isa
brief biography of Doris Foley by Ed Tyson.
Nona McGlashan, Donner Party
Remembrance. Sierra Heritage; Vol. 2; Nr. 1;
pp. 12-13; Summer 1982.
Discusses the acquisition of four paintings
by Robert Lebron for the Emigrant Trail
Museum at Donner Lake. The paintings
illustrate the Donner tragedy. Ultmately
there will be a series of fifteen paintings.
Also announces that, of the vials which
contained a piece of wood from the door sill of
the Murphy cabin, which were sold in order
to help finance the Donner Monument, a
number of left overs have been recovered.
They are sold at the Museum to help finance
the reconstruction of the Murphy cabin.
Michael Claytor and David Beesley, The
Basque and their Tree Carvings. Sierra
Heritage; Vol. 2; Nr. 1; pp. 18-21; Summer
1982.
In the October 1979 issue of the Bulletin of
the Nevada County Historical Society, the
authors presented an article on this subject.
During the almost three years which have
passed since this publication, the authors
have discovered more information on the
Basque sheep herders and their “graffiti” on
the aspen trees. The illustrations in this
article are new. Even for those who
remember the earlier article, this one is well
worth reading.
BOOK REVIEWS
Doris Foley Larsen, The Pioneer (Donner)
Monument, the Origin of a Statue. Nevada
City; Searls Historical Library; 1982.
A booklet about the history of amonument
is certainly unusual, but perhaps, so is this
history. The story really starts when, in
1879, after many years of research, G.F.
McGlashan wrote the first history of the
tragedy of the Donner Party, which came to
grief in the deep snow near present day
Truckee in the winter of 1846/47. Although
widely known, the main sources of the
‘history of the Donner Party, prior to 1879,
were the, largely inaccurate reports in the
contemporary newspapers. The Donner
Party was one of the life-long interests of
McGlashan.
Many of the emigrants who crossed the
continent went through unbelievable
hardships, but none of them could match the
privations of the Donner Party. For this
reason, it was a long time desire of
McGlashan that a monument should be
erected in their memory. In 1898, he achieved
that a resolution to sponsor such a
monument was adopted by the Native Sons
of the Golden West (NSGW). In 1901, a
Monument Committee, with Dr. C.
Chapman as chairman was appointed and
authorized to raise $5000 from the Parlors of
the NSGW. In addition, McGlashan offered
to have his book reprinted and sold for the
benefit of the Monument project. He also
prepared 5000 small vials, each containing a
fragment of the last log of the Murphy cabin,
to be sold as souvenirs.
An appeal to the Parlors of the NSGW
brought many suggestions, but little money.
It seems that, at this time, the controversy
whether the monument would be dedicated
to the Donner Party (as McGlashan wished)
or to all Pioneers (as the NSGW wished) was
started. This duality runs like a red thread
through the history of the monument.
Already in 1893 the site of the Breen cabin
was deeded by J. Maizen to McGlashan and
this was to be the location of the monument.
On May 11, 1910, ground was broken for the
foundation of the monument with a simple
ceremony. The foundation, provided with a
corner stone, was dedicated on June 10 of the
game year with a simple ceremony.
It was now time to select a sculptor for the
statue itself and a foundry to cast it. A well
known sculptor, Douglas Tilden, was invited
to submit a design. His concept was
grandiose, but apparently not tothe liking of
anybody because it emphasized the
suffering of the members of the Donner
Party rather than the courage and
determination of the pioneers. Thereafter, a
group of three sculptors was invited to
submit a design (Tilden declined to compete)
and from these, the statue as we see it now,
designed by J. McQuarrie, was selected. The
artist offered to do his work for a low fee and
the de Rome Foundry in San Francisco
offered to do its part at cost.
In the meantime, money had been
coming in from various sources, enabling the
work to be completed. In the spring of 1918,
twenty years after the first plans were made,
the monument was ready. On the foundation
rose a pedestal, 22.5 feet high (the height of
the snow in 1846!) which was surmounted by
McQuarrie’s statue. It was dedicated on June
6, 1918, on the occasion of the Forty First
Grand Parlor of the NSGW, which was held
in Truckee.
Unfortunately, the wording of the bronze
plaque, located on the east side of the
monument, caused a controversy between
Chapman and McGlashan, both of whom
had worked so hard towards the realisation
of the monument; a rift which apparently
never was healed.
Mrs. Foley’s book does not state whether
all funds, needed to pay the participants in
the work, were ever collected. It appears that
the Monument Committee remained in
existence, witness the fact that Dr.
Chapman was relieved of his chairmanship
in 1923; it seems to me an ungrateful act.
This, Doris Foley’s last book, is available
free from the Searls Library (214 Church
Street, Nevada City) as a token of
appreciation to those who contribute five
dollars (or more!) for the maintenance of the
library. vdP
William L. Kahr], Water and Power, the
Conflict over Los Angeles’ Water Supply in
Owens Valley. Berkeley, Los Angeles and
London; University of California Press;
1982.
Land and water have, more than gold,
contributed to the shaping of California.
And, since (agricultural) land is not of much
use without (irrigation) water, it may be
stated that water is the most important
natural resource of California. But the
demands for water are not by irrigation
alone, the cities, in many cases built at the
wrong place, demand water in large
quantities also. Consequently, California
has seen many large water projects executed:
Imperial Valley, the Owens Valley project of
Los Angeles, the Hetch Hetchy project of
San Francisco, the State Water Project. And
serveral of these projects were highly
controversial.
Among such projects, the Owens Valley
project has an especially bad name. Before I
read Mr. Kahri’s book, I felt that I was fairly
well informed about this project and my
reaction to the deeds of Los Angeles was
positively negative. After reading Mr.
Kahrl’s book, I realized that I actually did
not know much about the events. It appears
that the real story is much more complicated
than the story as usually presented. More
factors enter into it and the personalities and
motivations of the actors in the drama are
more complicated than generally portrayed.
Like previous authors, Mr. Kahr] has
based his story on public documents. He
writes: “...I have chosen to construct the
work entirely from published documents and
other materials available to the general
public, anchoring the narrative in sources
the reader can consult to trace the line of my
argument on any point with which he or she
may disagree.” However, the amount of
documentation which supports his narrative
is many times greater than what was used by
his predecessors and therefore we may look
at his work as the definitive history of the
Owens Valley conflict. The author is strictly
objective and attempts not to take sides.
However, reading his book did not change
my opinion on the behavior of Los Angeles.
The story is too complicated to even
summarise it. Therefore, we will here focus
on only one aspect, the role of President
Theodore Roosevelt. In 1906, the City of Los
Angeles already held options on a
considerable amount of land in Owens
Valley in order to secure the riparian rights.
However, the (Federal) Reclamation Service
was considering an irrigation project in the
valley and had placed a_ considerable
amount of public land in reserve,
withdrawing if from settlement. In order to
make the aqueduct pay, the City of Los
Angeles wanted to withdraw water, not only
for use in the city, but also to irrigate the, at
the time arid, San Fernando Valley. In order
to achieve this, the city needed the reserved
public lands and also the right of way over
Federal land for the aqueduct itself.
The Reclamation Service was well aware
of the fact that cancelling its irrigation
project would mean the destruction of Owens
Valley. A panel of three of their engineers
had stated so in no uncertain terms and a
special investigator, O’Fallon, sent out by
the Secretary of the Interior, Hitchcock,
31