Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
Volume 052-2 - April 1998 (8 pages)

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 8

can be accomplished without injury to the navigability of
said rivers or the land adjacent thereto.
The commission was an extremely powerful body and in
cases dealing with hydraulic mining, it constituted judge, jury
and executioner.
In 1893 the California legislature passed its own version
of something like the Caminetti Bill, which Governor Markham signed. In July 1893 the governor appointed John F.
Kidder as the state Debris Commissioner. Mr. Kidder was
better known as the operator and primary owner of the
Nevada County Narrow Gauge Railroad that ran between
Colfax and the twin cities of Grass Valley and Nevada City.
Mr. Kidder’s duties (for which he was paid $300 a year) were
to consult with and advise the Corps of Engineers Debris
Commission. Kidder was to examine and pass upon the
merits of solutions for the resumption of hydraulic mining
interests and to keep a record of such determinations.
He also had custody of $250,000 appropriated by the
legislature to build such dams if Congress appropriated an
equal amount. Initially the federal commission was hampered
by a lack of funds, but the commission still had the aura that
accompanied significant power. Miners and farmers both
looked to the federal commission for authority and direction.
Once the federal Debris Commission was funded, it acted
decisively and competently.
By 1900 hydraulic mining in the foothills was reduced to
yo minor workings. Even though the federal Debris Commission
issued 800 permits between 1893 and 1935, the mines that
were active were never so numerous as in the old days. This
could be attributed to several situations: water was not available in the quantities necessary for many operations; much of
the experienced work force had moved out of the area; and
finally, because many of the large operations could not prove
to the Debris Commission’s satisfaction that they could control their debris, they were denied permits.
In 1898 the federal commission sent a civilian assistant
engineer, Hubert Vischer, to examine the potential for erecting a dam at the Upper Narrows on the South Fork of the
Yuba River. Vischer spent a year preparing estimates and
designing a dam and diversion project for carrying debris
material to a settling basin 28 miles distant. The report
became known as the “1898 Project.”
At that time the Narrows site for a dam was considered
unfavorable because of the following conditions:
1. difficulty and expense of obtaining suitable foundations
2. limited storage capacity of the contemplated dam/reservoir
3. uncertainty of being able to store the lighter debris and
none of immense quantity lying in the river bed below the
down (dam?) site
/™ 4. the excessive cost of the entire project (over a million
dollars)
As a result of the dissatisfaction with the “1898 Project,”
NCHS Bulletin April 1998
attention was given to the possibility of storing the debris
within the river bed. This became known as the “1899 Project.”
In June 1902 an act of Congress was approved to restrain
the debris in the bed of the South Fork of the Yuba River. As
initially drawn, the plan envisioned four barriers being built
across the river, the dredging of a settling basin and the
building of training walls to guide the river in the desired
course. In addition a cut was to be made through the promontory in the river known as Daguerre Point to provide an
overflow channel. Daguerre Point is roughly twelve miles
below the site of the present dam forming Lake Englebright.
The small barrier dams consisted of fascines placed across
the width of the river. Each fascine was about a foot in
diameter and consisted of brush and strong poles one inch in
diameter and wired together every three feet. The fascines
were aligned with the flow of the river and were raised above
normal water level. The pockets in the fascines were to trap
debris particles.
In retrospect, this appears to be a naive stop-gap measure.
Subsequent winter storms destroyed all of the barrier dams
with the result that engineering was concentrated at the
Daguerre Point cut. There a concrete dam and spillway was
constructed and with improvements in the channel, the dam
was found to be partially effective in preventing tailings
delivered at Marysville. This work was not completed until
1935 and stands to the present day.
In 1925 state legislation created the California State Hydraulic Mining Commission, which was charged with the
examination of the feasibility of resuming hydraulic mining.
While this commission did issue a report favoring a resumption of hydraulic mining and suggesting that three dams
be built on the affected rivers and the purchase of storage
capacity behind Bullards Bar Dam on the North Fork of the
Yuba River, there was sufficient opposition to insure that no
funds were committed to the project.
The commission did gain some recognition by listing the
benefits that would result from the building of the dams and
the resumption of hydraulic mining. These benefits were:
1, Revival of Nevada and Placer Counties due to increased
employment.
2. Increased revenue for the valley due to orders for machinery and supplies.
3. Development of water supplies.
4. Protection of farm lands.
5. Prevention of natural debris from reaching the navigable
river channels.
6. Dams would provide water for irrigation and power. These
benefits sounded most attractive during the depression
years.
THE DAM
IN 1935, WITH THE AID OF Congressman Harry Englebright of Nevada County, Congress approved the development of storage facilities on the Yuba, Bear and American
13