Search Nevada County Historical Archive
Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).
To search for an exact phrase, use "double quotes", but only after trying without quotes. To exclude results with a specific word, add dash before the word. Example: -Word.

Collection: Directories and Documents > Nevada County News & Advertisments

1865 (627 pages)

Go to the Archive Home
Go to Thumbnail View of this Item
Go to Single Page View of this Item
Download the Page Image
Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard
Don't highlight the search terms on the Image
Show the Page Image
Show the Image Page Text
Share this Page - Copy to the Clipboard
Reset View and Center Image
Zoom Out
Zoom In
Rotate Left
Rotate Right
Toggle Full Page View
Flip Image Horizontally
More Information About this Image
Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard
Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)
Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 627  
Loading...
18 JANUARY 21, 1865 NEVADA GAZETTE While this affair was still pending, Ridge sent us a challenge, which we promptly accepted, but declined to make any arrangements for a meeting until his affair with Mr. Bennett had been disposed of. ... Now, mark the sequel. Having “branded” and “posted” us as above, Ridge again seeks recognition from us. He sent us another message yesterday, which we positively declined to receive upon any terms. The very fact of his again addressing us shows conclusively that he was convinced that the position he had taken was untenable; that he had lost character among his own friends by his sneaking, contemptible, cowardly course; and he was obliged to do something to relieve himself from the brand of disgrace and infamy which he had stamped upon himself. And thus he again chewed his own excrement. . . . We accepted a challenge from the miserable dog of the pestilence only in obedience to the demand of a vicious public sentiment, which renders it imperative upon one in our position to avouch and assert his entire responsibility on all occasions; and for the same reason we would have given the villain an equal meeting, and done our best to kill him. We do not, however, recognize the “code.” It is not only unlawful, but barbarous, and, as generally administered, murderous. The intrinsic value of our life may be small; but there are those to whom it is precious and in a manner indispensable; and to them, as well as to the friends who have given us their advance and proffered their assistance in this affair, we owe not to place it in jeopardy at the whim of any renegade rebel who may consider himself aggrieved at our plain way of characterizing treason and traitors. . . . If our friends deem it indispensable to our “honor” that we should shoot a dog, we will obtain the privilege from Marshal Venard when next he has a batch of impounded curs under sentence of death. As to the matter of our courage, any one who doubts it is at liberty to satisfy himself at any time and in any place. SAD ACCIDENT.— Yesterday morning a little boy about five years old, son of Mr. McFall who resides near Soggs’s mill, was accidentally struck on the head with a pick by an older boy, the point of the instrument penetrating the little fellow’s skull to the depth of two inches. A surgeon was summoned from this city, and some faint hopes are entertained of saving the child’s life. DISTRICT COURT—DECEMBER TERM—HON. T. B. MCFARLAND PRESIDING.—The following business was transacted in this Court yesterday: Sarah R. Staats vs. [Silas] D. Staats—Application for divorce. Referred to E. W. Smith to take testimony. Catharine O. Smith vs. B. F. Smith—Application for divorce. Referred as above. H. M. Moore vs. W. R. Morrow—Statement for new trial submitted and overruled; notice and bond of appeal to Supreme Court filed by appellant Morrow. H. T. W. Heyer was admitted to citizenship. Court adjourned to the 27th inst. [REBEL RAID]... It seems that Mr. County Surveyor [Horace] Bradley has confessed that he was the party who broke into the Courthouse [on January 18th], and says he did so because he wanted his instruments. We think his conduct very foolish and reprehensible; and if he had been shot while in the act of breaking in, or while in the building, the verdict of the public would have been—”Served him right.” The fact that he is a county officer does not justify him in breaking into a public building, even though his own office may be in that building. SAN JUAN ITEMS.—An attentive correspondent at North San Juan furnishes the following, under date of the 18th: Accident—A Norwegian named “Pete” was severely injured to-day in the mining claims of Bowen & Co. on San Juan Hill. A blast was about being let off, and being anxious to see the effect he approached too near. When the mine exploded gravel and earth were thrown against him, considerably bruising him and breaking one of his ribs.