Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 20

NEVADA COUNTY NUGGET
solu
If the federal bill had been enacted in the form in
which it lay quietly in committee for some weeks
before its sudden emergence, the issue would have
been relatively simple. The bill, in brief, placed a
‘penalty on states which failed to enact regulations
for "effective control" of billboards and junkyards
along primary highways, Additional funds for purposes of promoting highway beauty also were authorized,
Everyone blamed the business ills of the town on lack
of free parking. ‘There was a strong feeling expressed
that taking out the parking meters was the only solution and the term "ghost town" was used often to
describe the future of the village, It was suggested
that the meters be removed and the merchants contribute to making up the revenue loss caused by the
removal,
We went up and down the two block one main street
business section asking for yes or no answers to five
interelated questions,
Those who had no answers
were listed as uncommitted,
The answers are interesting because they show a
trend strikingly like that now being expressed in
Nevada City.
A total of 39 merchants were interviewed and this is
how it
went. Do you want free parking? Yes--34,
No--4, Uncommitted--1, Do you think free parking
«
The entire Nugget
staff wishes
you and yours
a joyous Christmas.
IN THE FOOTHILLS VEIN
would increase business?
Yes--37, No--2.
Do you
think a reported decline in retail business is due to
lack of free parking? Yes--29, No--9, Uncommitted--1, Do you think the decline will continue
unless something is done to remedy the parking situation? Yes--27, No--7, Uncommitted--7,
Would
you be willing to contribute to a plan by which the
merchants would make up the revenue lost by removal
of the parking meters? Yes--17, No--7, Uncommit
ted--8,
The last. question is the clincher for while everyone
is convinced about the cause of the malady, when it
The bill was less than perfect, However, deficiencies
were fairly well covered by an important amendment
providing that state and local governments retained
full right-to-legislate-more-restrictively. -The-California Roadside Council and other Roadside Councils
had worked hard for this amendment, and, once it
was accepted, we had put our full support behind the
bill, It was in this quite acceptable form that the
bill had come torest incommittee, It was still there,
with no action on it in sight, when, in the first week
in October, the Congress seemed about to adjourn.
Then the unexpected happened, With no time re
maining for more than the most precipitate action,
the President called for the "Highway Beautification
Bill” to be brought out of committee and acted upon
at once, The bill was passed, but at an appalling
price, The price was the inclusion of a new amend
ment, obviously inspired by the billboard and junkyard
interests, It provided for "just compensation" for
billboards and jun kyards
which are required to be
removed, in addition to allowance of ample time for
their amortization, It even provided for “just compensation” to be paid to the landowners whose land
was used for these eyesores, Federal funds would
provide most of this “compensation”,
A harmless amendment? On the face of it, it may
appear harmless; probably it appeared so to most
members of the Congress andto the President. The
insidiousness of the “compensation” factor is apparent
only to those who see in it a denial of the basic principles of zoning; to those who have followed the
sound and patient judicial vindication of these zoning
principles and their application to roadside control;
comes to anteing up, the troops scatter,
During that night in Suffern while merchant after
merchant stood up and blamed the business decline on
the lack of free parking, shopping centers, the shabby
appearance of the downtown section and overzealous
traffic police,a clean cut young man sat in the back
taking it all in with just a bit of a smile on his face,
When all the complaints were over, he stood up.
"I don't have any lack of customers," he said
quietly,
"I deal in high quality merchandise and
AN OLD REFRAIN IS
BECOMING POPULAR HERE
to those who have fought this same "compensation"
Proposal on state and local levels and in so doing
have leamed of the
We were doing some cleaning up about the house
confusion which would result
from adoption of any such proposal--confusion and
the other’day and came across a newspaper story we
wrote almost 10 years ago,
the halting of present billboard removal under local
It was written about a little town on the New YorkNew Jersey border called Suffern, Suffern was suffering 10 years ago from lack of business and everyone
was blaming it on lack of parking,
an old familiar threat, In was this very same provision, amended into State Senator Jack McCarthy's
Suffern had a railroad and Suffern was feeling the
law.
Here in Califomia, the "compensation proposal"
good service,
place to park,"
My customers always seem to find a
We have not been back to Suffern since we wrote
that story, but we are sure they are feeling the pinch
of the shopping centers, The refrain that is being
sung here lately is like the tune in Suffern 10 years
ago,
It would be interesting to know what the situ
ation will be in the business district of Nevada City
10 years from now,
---Don Hoagland
CALIFORNIA
HIGHWAY BEAUTY ACT.
WAS BADLY WEAKENED
The fact that the federal "Highway Beauty Act” was
passed and signed into law is, of course, Common
knowledge, Our own report on the significance and
business pinch from the sprawling shopping centers in
nearby New Jersey, but aside from those differences,
it was astoundingly like Nevada City and so were the
probable effect of this new Act of Congress has been
postponed from week to week, pending conference
with legal and planning advisors, with our state legislators, and with officials in Washington,
is
billboard bill in 1959, that caused him to withd
raw
the bill as "worse than worthless", Then,
as now, it
was promoted by opponents of roadside control,
The California Roadside Council therefore had
only
_to hear of this amendment to become thoroughly
alarmed,
It was too late, however, to send out
a
general call for help, It was too late, we learned,
upon our anxious inquiries in Washington, to
do any thing at all, The bill was moving rapidly now,
and
no further amendment would be considered least of
all, removal of an amendment which just
now had
been adopted, As for a presidential veto that,
for
many reasons, could not be considered even a
remote
possibility. The fact isthat probably no one
in
command in that final situation understood
the
significance of that amendment in quite the
way that
We grass-roots workers understood it -not
the President, nor Mrs, Johnson, whose effort
s had inspired
"legislation for beauty"; not the "authors"
of the
legislation (Chairmen of the two Subcommi
ttees on
Roads), who had been assigned the
bills to
introduce
under their names but who had evidenced
little or
no enthusiams for them; not our represen
tatives in
rary
RMiawawla @ as ee ee =
problems, the supposed causes and the proposed
tions,
The village board had a big parking meeting,
10Q@&q
esl inde Bae reel Pinta eel Vn 10
Nerembhear 99
ies meister esl dit tearlT esl inate Bae
S96T ‘ZZ Joquis0eq***3083nN AQuNOD epeAeN**
PAA teen
3