Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 8

Land divisions
Wed., Feb. 26,1975 The Nevada County oe 7
Decision on
policy, ordinance
“For the purpose of land
division gross area means the
total area of property to the
center line of any street, highway, road, water way or ‘public
utility easement.’’
With this unanimous decision
supervisors hope to settle once
and for all the lingering and
differing interpretations of
board policy and county ordinance on the subject of gross
and net as related to land
divisions.
The settlement of the ongoing and highly confused
debates between supervisors,
staffers, engineers and real
estate persons concerning interpretation of policy and ordinance did not come easy. At
times it was almost .a pitched
battle with Chairman Tom
Turner, the board champion, for
the eventual description of gross
area.
Turner’s chief complaint was
that county staffers had not
referred questions of interpretation back to the board,
which makes policy.
“There is a fine line and we
can’t bring everything back to
the board. Exercise of certain
discretion is part of our job,’’
defended County Counsel. Leo
Todd.
Eric Rood had
‘“cheard enough’’ to assure
himself there was a great area
of differences of opinion.
“The way the ordinance was
drafted all divisions of land are
regulated by the county,”’’
contributed Director of Public
Works Terry Lowell.
‘Are you saying the ordinance
is not compatible with the
board’s intent?” queried Willie
Curran.
“Even the state law is not
perfect that is why we have an
attorney general and courts,”’
offered Planning Director
Sharon Boivin.
Because of the “uncertain”
way policy comes into being
Lowell suggested that all future
items be in ordinance form.
Ed Sylvester, an engineer,
“didn’t give a damn” what the
county requires. He just wants
to be certain what the
requirements are. To avoid
“putting the staff in a bind” he
would like to see all Policy in
written form.
Turner thumbed through
ordinances and board minutes,
past and present, and got the
idea ‘‘there are conflicting
definitions in two ordinances.”
“There are not as many reruns on television as there are
re-runs on net and gross
problems,’’ complained Dean
Deniz, representing real estate
interests. <
Todd tossed the ball to the
board with “It’s obviously a
disagreement -you the
supervisors are the referees.
Tell us what you want.”’
Because Turner could
“almost make the motion in his
sleep’’ he volunteered the
successful motion that ‘should
resolve the problem once and for
all.’’
Supervisors also had a first
go-around with compliance with
the new state subdivision act
which becomes effective March
1, 1975.
Planning. Director Mrs.
Boivin, and Wes Zachary,
assistant director of public
works, offered their efforts to
bring this county into compliance by the deadline.
After a lengthy and technical
re-hash of the old subdivision
ordinance and proposals for a
new one the discussion was reset for 1:30 p.m. next Tuesday.
Mrs. Boivin proposed some
changes, some of which were
controversial, for the new
county subdivision ordinance.
Deniz and Sylvester wanted the
old ordinance ‘“‘left alone’’ except’as necessary to change it to
conform to state law. ‘‘Let’s not
solve old problems by creating
new ones,’’ Sylvester urged.
And there was yet more to
come concerning county policy.
--County counsel and the
director of public works were
ordered to revise the county
electrical ordinance so that size
14 wiring is acceptable here.
Turner, who is in the electrical
business, initiated the
discussion resulting in the
motion. He referred to rising .
CLASSIFIED
Chappie bill aimed at
legislator bid changes
Assemblyman Gene Chappie
has introduced Assembly Bill
641, a measure which would
require that all contracts for
construction or alteration of
legislative offices within the
Capitol be awarded on the basis
of competitive bidding, to be
approved by the Department of
General Services.
The bill also requires-that any
purchase of supplies, office
equipment and other merchandise must go through the
bidding process. According to
Chappie, ‘*Present law
specifically exempts the
legislature from having to go out
to bid for either the purchase of
equipment or for alterations or
construction of its offices.”’
However, the Chappie
‘measure, if passed and signed
into law, will require that any
contract entered into by the
legislature through its rules
committees which exceeds
$1,000, must meet the same
requirements as any other state
agency in this regard.
construction costs and the trend
to purchase and move mobile
and factory built homes in the
county.
He said the county electrical
ordinance is-in conflict with the
state and suggested clarification
to bring them in compliance. He
claimed the present. code is
more stringent than the state’s.
He contended, and. Chief
Building Inspector Chuck Coen
agreed, that the state code is as
safe or safer than the one imposed by the county.
There are some of these type
homes in the county in which the
walls must be ripped open and
wiring changed because,
although they comply with state
code, they are not as specified
by the county.
The chief building inspector
said there are five factory built
homes waiting at the county line
because of the differences
between the county and state
requirements.
The directive to county
counsel and director of public
works implied that the five
“waiting at the county line”
would fall under the new
specifications.
—Snow loads for mobile homes
had another day at the board
too. A new state law effective
September 1 requires snow
loads of 30 pounds at the 2001 to
2,500 foot elevation; from no
elecation to 2,000 feet the
requirement is 20 pounds.
A motion was made to implement the _ new _ state
requirement but on further
study it appeared there was
some. confusion concerning
elevations. After considerable
discussion the motion was withdrawn.
After more discussion including reference to snow loads
at various elevations and to
snow roof maintenance in
mobilehome parks, the final
decision was to keep snow loads,
as they are now, at 20 pounds per
square foot below 2,500 feet until
the date that state law will
apply. And that is the board’s
intent.as of right now.
AbdbS
10. Crafts and Services
rer
ROBERT L. ROSS, JR.
QPTOMETRIST
147 Mill St., Ph. 273-6246
40. Miscellaneous for Sale
ttl we Susi
WILLSON‘S SWAP meet March
1 & 2. Call 273-0456. 11465 Nev.
City Hwy.
Sit back and let classified ads do the, selling, renting or buying
for you.
Earl G. Waters
Biennial conventions
Despite the complaints about.
the unduly lengthy campaigns,
California’s major political
parties have acted in concert.to
string them out even further.
This must be the effect of the
change of the biennial party
conventions from midsummer
dates preceding elections to
winter meetings following the
general elections.
It means that aspiring candidates who feel they must
appear at such conclaves are
necessarily now required to
make known their availability
and commence campaigning a
full year before the spring of
election year.
Such was the case at the
Democratic and erm
party conventions held in
Sacramento during the past
month.
The Democratic rally brought
out some Presidential hopefuls
seeking to enlist early support
from the state which will send to
the 1976 national convention the
nation’s largest delegation.
Former U.S. Senator Fred
Harris and former Georgia
Governor Jimmy Carter were
on hand as were U.S. Senator
Lloyd Bentson of Texas, Pennsylvania Governor Milton Shapp
and Arizona Congressman
Morris Udall.
Curiously, Washington’s
Senator Henry Jackson, considered by many to be the
strongest frontrunner for the 76
nomination, skipped the show.
So, too, did other prominent
Democrats who have previously
been candidates and cannot yet
be counted out for the next race.
Hubert Humphrey, George
McGovern, Birch Bayh, Eugene
McCarthy and Edmund Muskie
were among fhe missing. And,
one who figures to have great
influence at the 76 convention if
he is not himself a candidate,
Governor George Wallace, also
passed up the gathering.
Perhaps it was wise since
California’s Governor Jerry
Brown stole the stage in a brief
appearance, even though he has
made‘ no pretentions at being a
Presidential candidate, at least
not in 1976.
But for those who did come to
the party it was clear they have
now obligated themselves to
many long months of campaign
work and expense.
The Republican convention
two weeks later did not. attract
_afty Presidential aspirants,
excepting former Governor
Ronald Reagan who isn’t yet a
publicly avowed candidate. It
did, however, draw a declared
1976 opponent of Senator John
Tunneyand several other
potential challengers.
Unlike Senator Alan Cranston,
who was viewed as nigh unbeatable by the Republicans in
the 1974 contest, and the election
proved their estimates of
Cranston correct, Tunney is
considered an easy target for
almost anyone.
Because of this, former Lt.
\
Governor Robert Finch made an
obvious attempt to discourage
competition of the 76 GOP
senatorial nomination by announcing his candidacy weeks
before the convention.
The effort wasn’t altogether
successful as California’s
Goldwater, Congressman Barry
M., Jr., State Senator Dennis
Carpenter and Dr. William
Banowsky, Pepperdine College
prexy, were on the svene. All
three have been itching to run
for Tunney’s seat.
State Senator Bill Richardson,
who handily defeated Dr. Earl
Brian last year for the honor of
being the Republican challenger
of Cranston, was actively
present and may well be considering another shot at the U.S.
Senate, this time against
Tunney.
It is an irony, in a state where
most already agree that campaigns extend over too many
months by reason of the distance
between the June primaries and
the November general elections, ©
that. the major parties would
have created the situation
wherein the campaigns now will
extend a year longer.
As even those who merely
observe have come to learn,
campaigns are _ expensive
propositions, made un_ necessarily costly by the early
primaries.
It was not. always thus nor
need it be continued.For many years California
primaries were held in late
August. This was changed,
presumably temporarily, during
WW II on the premise more time
was. needed to permit those
overseas in the military to
exercise their franchise.
But the June primary has
become a fixture and efforts to
change it have run into opposition from some county
clerks who contend they need
the extra time and from those
who wish to avoid a separate
primary solely for Presidential
preference.
Others say the clerks would
really have no problem although
a few-changes in present law
might be necessary. They also
point out there might not be any
need for a special presidential
primary if California changed
its dates. The contention is the
state is too big to ignore and the
national convention dates would
be changed.This would have the
additional benefit of shortening _
the Presidential campaigns.
WINS SECOND PLACE
Robert Paasch of Chicago
Park, a senior agricultural
engineering major at California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, and his team,
_recently won'second place at the
Southwestern Livestock
Exposition in Ft. Worth, Tex. He
was also on the livestock judging
team which won the carload
intercollegiate judging
competition at the National
Western States Show in Denver,
Colo.