Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 16

ft
é
is
F
erence hha three A Net 2 ger Ae one : BIR oy AES
—_ = mori isin
COUNTY GROWTH RATE
WILL HIT NEW HIGH
The New Year is here.
This will be the year of construction
in Nevada County. The $60 million
Yuba-Bear Project, now only'14 per cent
complete, with its four dams, two
powerhouses and water transmission
lines, will be completed. .
The new annex to the Nevada County
Courthouse will be completed.
The $4 million freeway through Nevada City will be commenced.
These, in addition to an expanded
private construction program will make
1964 a year of building in Nevada
County. ,
And more will follow, for the YubaBear Project when completed will then
be ready for some $4 million in recreational development. The Nevada City
freeway will have a two year constructioncycle, and willbe followed by projects carrying the freeway through
Grass Valley and over Pet Hill. Malakoff State Park acquisition, slated to
begin this year, will be completed in
‘the near future years and facilities there
will be constructed.
_ The .pace of, growth, accelerated in
1963 with the start of the Yuba-Bear
Project, will hit a new high this year.
It is likely that the pace will slacken
some in years to come, but it is almost
positive that the pace will never return
to what we would have referred to as
normal a few years back.
There will be new faces in Nevada
County this year. Welcome them, for
they will be building our future. And
remember that the problems they bring
are not theirs alone to solve. We have
known for several years that this growth
was coming, and we share the responsibility for problems that will arise, for
we might have avoided the problems had
we been better prepared for this year,
this decade of growth.
SIERRA BYWAYS
SISTER CITIES FOR
OUR LOCAL COMMUNITIES?
SISTER NATION...We Californians now have a sisternation---Chile, Early this month in Washington, D.C.
a formal agreement was signed by Governor Edmund G.
Brown, Chilean Ambassador Gutierrez Olivos, and U.S.
Alliance for Progress coordinator Teodoro Moscoso, an
agreement which provides fora program of technical coperation in the fields of agriculture, water resources,
transportation, education and economic planning..It
was an historic. document, for it is the first time that a
U.S. state has chosen to work with a foreign nation in
the mutual development of common goals. Congres:~man HaroldT. Johnson, who was present for the signing,
_ noted thatthe agreement resulted from a request by for~
mer President John F. Kennedy to the people of California because of similarities between California and Chile
.eeeeChile's economy includes major industries in
cattle, mining and agriculture, and the country has ex~
tensive forested regions. ..Historically, there are examples of close ties between the two governmental
regions. Morethan 40, 000 Chileans joined North Americans in “rushing” to the Mother Lode in 49er days,
by contributing to the heritage of the state. At the time
of the San Francisco fire and earthquake in 1906, Chile
sent immediate aid to the stricken city. Following an
even more devastating earthquake in Chile in 1960,
California responded with relief supplies to Chile...
‘An even better example of the friendship that already
exists between Chile and California might‘be found in
the Ciudad de California. There, in the plaza of this
town in the South American country, below the singlestarred red, white and blue flag of Chile, flies the California Bear Flag.
So we now have a sister-nation. This might bring to
mind the question of whether our gold-dust twin cities
should consider joining the people-to-people program by
adopting sister-cities... This columnist has had two
such proposals mentioned to him in the past three years”
.«s+Dr. Jorge Kuon, Fulbright graduate.scholar at UC
Davis for two years, and a freshman visitor to the area
with his daughter, Lisa, beginning with the first Spring
foreign student visitation from Davis, suggested that “it
would be wonderful" if Grass Valley and Nevada City
could become sister-cities to Cuzco, his home city high
inthe Andes, near the famedincan ruins. Cuzco, 11,000
feet up, hasa winter void of precipitation; hence he and
his daughter witnessed their first snowfall on an April ride
up Highway 20...The other suster-city suggestion
came from Mexican Consulate Antonio Islas, whothought
the charm and beauty of Nevada City particularly qualified it tobe sister-city to Mexico's most renowned silver
city, Taxco, Sr. Islas urged local art association leaders
tothink of the sister-city proposal and to sound out local
opinions, He felt that as sister-cities Nevada City and’
Taxco might even be able to arrange exchanges of art
exhibits...The urgency of other local projects, the
flow of news, and the general mad pace that invades
a newspaper office had filed these suggestions -~-until
now. How do you feel about the idea, Mr, and Mrs.
Reader? Let me know’. ‘abides i
CALIFORNIA
IGNORANCE, INERTIA
OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
The legitimate city: Its name is Pasadena or Palo Alto
or Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco.
Traditionally it encompasses a central business district,
some industry, and surrounding residential and recreational areas, It has a city hall, police and fire departments, a jail, and a balanced array of agencies and
facilities through which a broad range of the people's
needs are served, Incorporation of this traditional city
and annexation to it of adjacent developing areas were
the normal and logical result of community growth,
This isthe city that assumed a good deal of civic responsibility at an early stage. It is what most of us think
of when we think of "city." Until World War II it had a
a set of boundaries be yond which could be found "the
country."
Today the legitimate city, long accustomed to tackling its own problems, is in the position of being unable to solve many of the major problems it faces, It is
faced by a variety of problems extending beyond its
boundaries and beyond the reach and often the understanding of its government.
Atits perimeter, for example, it is typically hemmed
in by and bled by other urban areas, New shopping centers and subdivisions spring up in the amoeba-like unincorporated fringe area, draining away retail customers
and «middle-income residents fromthe old downtown
center of the legitimate city, Yet the government of the
legitimate city is not in a position to do much about the
situation. /
The city suffers from smog and traffic congestion generated by other areas-and-dumped within its boundaries.
Yet by more or less blindly widening local roads, constru€ting local parking lots, approving state plans for
---Dean Thompson
freeways passing through, the city itself invites more ©
cars to putter around in the vicinity and manufacture
“more smog and ultimately full-scale, big league traffic
congestion,
-Often the city does not act as if it understands that the
changes and developmentstaking place in the, entire surrounding urban region affect its vitals as much as those
developments which took place within its own borders,
before it became incorporated. Instead of seeking somehow to extend its voice and its authority into the full
range of regional affairs, it seems content to engage in
petty local thievery of land, people, and industry~-inviting alike response fiom neighboring communities,
and engendering a general regional deterioration.
For example, few cities in California pursue orderly,
positive annexation programs, involving the full developing area on the city fringes. More likely, a city
will carry on piece-meal annexation, acquiring the most
valuable fringe areas, and leaving to the county the remaining fringe areas with low tax bases, thus making
them unsuitable for incorporation and undesirable for annexation., In making a momentary gain, the city at the
same time consigns much of the land surrounding it to
sloppy, ugly development.
Maps of California city boundaries show a confusion
of’ bumps and hollows, resulting from unsound annexation programs. These strange configurations complicate
planning problems, and hinder cities from providing services efficiently.
Almost every city, of course, competes fiercely with
its neighbors for new industry. But the result is not in
evitably of benefit, even to itself. For example, the
destrugtion of,the San Eran ¢ isco Bay ridelands by individual cities seeking toraise their tax bases may in the
long-run depress the vitality of these communities as
well as the beauty and recreational appeal of the entire
area, and counterbalance the anticipated economic
gains,
The government of today's legitimate city ekes out its
living by foraging where it.cgn for the tax dollar, destroying the attractiveness of its surroundings, and denying
through ignorance or inertia its responsibility for the region to which it belongs.
---Samuel E, Wood and Alfred Heller,
from “The Phantom Citiés of California”
LOBBYISTS---DO THEY
SPEND 100 MUCH?
That legislative whipping -boy, the lobbyist, was again
brought under the lash during our general session last
spring. Not to be out-shadowed by the sex scandal then
rocking British governmental circles, our newspapers
alleged that unidentified California lobbyists had made
use of illegal feminine companionshipto influence legislation, An Attorney-General's investigation made later
turned up no evidence of truth in the allegation.
Independently of this probe, the Senate Committee on
Legislative Representation announced that it would make
a full-scale study of lobbying, to determine among other
things the level of current practice in the field, the effectiveness of the laws controlling legislative advocates,
andthe desirability of making changes either in the law
or its administration, or in the applicable rules of both
Houses of the Legislature.
Our State Constitution specifically defines bribery of
a Legislator as “lobbying”, and makes it a felony.
Equally, it makes acceptance of a bribe by a Legislator
afelony, conviction of which alse brings disenfranchisement in addition to other penalties. The Penal Code
makes either giving of a bribe to influence a legislative
vote, or itsacceptance, a-felony punishable by peniten. tiary confinement,
The law which requires paid legislative advocates to
register with both Houses, and to file monthly reports of.
9 a8eq'' pa6r ‘g Arenues:**1088nN ous’ '*9 e8eg”