Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 12

is
CE ot oe
€
ea
«g
\.
2 eS ee
a The Nevada County Nugget Wednesday, October 1, 1969
Supervisors to do all necessary
to get Perimeter Road opened
A debate over the policy action stating that Spenceville will
be Nevada county's major road
to open up the Beale area overshadowed part of the discussion
concerning opening of Perimeter Road Tuesday.
Acting Chairman Dean Lawrence noted an article in last
Friday's Union said official
county policy now is to have
Spenceville become the major
route. She did not recall the
policy being made and wanted
to know when and how it was.
brought before the board.
Supervisors William Thomas
said he didn't remember the
date, but the policy was raised
by him and Supervisor ‘Willie
Curran as the road committee
and was adopted by the full
board. He said the matter had
been referred to the committee by the late Lou Hartman,
then chairman.
"The road committee has no
authority to act unless the
matter is referred by the board,
not the chairman," Mrs. Lawrence replied,
"The road committee can
recommend anything, anytime,"
Thomas contended.
Thomas said he and Curran
flew over the two potential road
sites with Public Works Director Harry Hider one Tuesday
morning, then made their
recommendation later the same
day. He asked that the flight records... be... checked...so..the..date
could be found and the minutes
of that meeting checked,
Mrs. Lawrence added that
"when we are businesslike and
refer things properly, no one
is suspicious,"
The she asked Thomas why
the county "can't. be interested
in both Perimeter and Spenceville.
Thomas laughed and replied:
"I think all members of the
board are interested in both.
If we are talking about opening
Perimeter, Spenceville is not
in competition at all. If we are
talking about the county spending
money to develop access for
Camp Far West recreation and
Capehart housing to expand Nevada county's economy, we have
to consider both routes."
Mrs. Lawrence then asked,
for a recess to determine the
date the policy was made so the
simplicity ....
BERGEMANN
& SON
Funeral Chapel]
ready to serve you]
day or night
Call 265-2421
BOST AVE. OFF LOWER
GRASS VALLEY ROAD,
NEVADA CITY
tape could be played. However,
because of the press of other
agenda items, the determination
of when the policy was made and
what it said was left for the end
of the afternoon session.
No one ever did find the proper reference in the minutes.
The confusion was cleared in
the afternoon in any event as
the board formally recommitted
itself to making Spenceville the
major route.
The motion was part of one
recommitting the county to opening Perimerter Road (see other
story) and was adopted 3-1.
Mrs. Lawrence voted no, saying.
she wanted the Spenceville part
separated from the other and
studied later.
She said the economics involved in the two routes should
be studied thoroughly. :
Public Works Director Harry
Hider replied that he appeared
before the board last December,
before ‘Mrs, Lawrence took office, and proposed that "the
logical route" for a major road
was Spenceville. Hider contended it would be shorter, more
direct and more economical than
Perimeter.
Later, Mrs. Lawrence chastised the road committee, Supervisors William Thomas and
Willie Curran, for allegedly providing The Union an article explaining the Spenceville policy
without first providing the details to the board.
Curran denied such a meeting, and The Union's managing
editor, Joe Bigham, who wrote
the article, said there was no
such meeting and the road, committee did not approach him.
Bigham. said he interviewed
Thomas and Hider to obtain a
detailed analysis of the action
taken some time ago. He had
planned for several weeks to
do an investigative piece on the
Perimeter-Spenceville policy
changes, the editor said.
Mixed into the meeting was a
‘ court order from Superior Court
Judge Vernon Stoll _ that
didn't directly involve the
Spenceville or Perimeter cases,
but could have far-reaching
ramifactions.
There was a disagreement as
to. just what the ruling, which
involves a civil case, meant,
but it was indicated the result
may be to reestablish public
roads along routes that were
public roads before the Army
took over this southwest territory in 1943,
If such roads are public,
Spenceville --the proposed major route--would be in public
ownership now. The county had
assumed it was owned by adjacent property owners.
The case would not cover
Perimeter, however, as it did
not exist in 1943, Perimeter was
constructed later by the Army.
SPENCEVILLE ROAD through the southwest part of Nevada county has been a topic of much talk —
at the board of supervisors of late, so The Union dug deep into its old pictures for these World
War II Vintage shots of the old town of Spenceville. The supervisors are considering whether
Spenceville Road should’ become a major route between Beale AFB and western Nevada county
but during the war the area was used for maneuvers such as shown here. Above, a group of
soldiers looks over the town. The photo below is not the board of supervisors considering
the Spenceville situation. It is a group of soldiers pretending to attack a German building.