Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 12

r
«
_ HEADING the Nevada County
_ of Nevada City, talk over their program for gettin
"4 ~*The Nevada County Nugget _ . October 23, 1968
“Women for Humphrey campaign, Ruth Paine (left) and Jean Innis,
g out the vote Nov. 5.
‘Womenfor Humphrey’
set local precinct drive
"Women for Humphrey" in
Nevada .county plan to have
workers in every precinct on a
door-to-door basis along with
a telephone campaign to get
out the vote for their candidate.
Co-chairmen Ruth Paine and
Jean Innis both of Nevada City,
in announcing their committees,
told why they prefer Humphrey
for president, They listed his
liberal record in Congress as
a civil rights leader and his
support of social programs.Both said that Humphrey "is
much more responsive than
Richard Nixon" and that from
everything "we read about Nixon
he has alow-boiling point" which
makes them wonder how he
would react if a crisis occurred
"in this atomic age.”
Mrs. Paine said Humphrey is
"a more compassionate man"
than his Republican opponent
and Mrs, Innis said Nixon is
a hawk, that Humphrey is more
aware of. home problems "of
the black and. white, rich
and poor" and will be better able
to work with Congress.
"Humphrey has better rapport than Nixon," said Mrs.
Innis, "and I thank God for his
sense of humor."
The co-chairmen said they
are interested in "the thinking
people. These are the ones we
hope to reach in our campaign.”
They announced the following
committee . chairmen: Margie
Kopp, precincts; Kathy Hirtz,.
the Teacher-vote for Humphrey;
Mary Patterson, Dollars for
Humphrey; Mary O'Reilly, Senjor Citizens for Humphrey, andGladys Pizzotti, rural voters.
‘Rough-Ready
water users’
meeting set
A water users meeting will
be held in Rough and Ready:
Grange hall at 7:30 p.m. October 28 with Nevada Irrigation
District speakers explaining the
two loan issues that will be on
the November 5 ballot.
NID directors Melvin Brown
and Alex Ferreira, chairman of
the board, and manager Frank
Clendenen will talk on the $4,950,000 Bureau of Reclamation
and the $3,500,000 Davis-Grunsky loans.
Planners set Oct. 28
_ Massive funds for vocations
ago, it means the possibility of The money, in, effect, he said,
all sorts of.-new--programs-to wil] raise the ceiling and lower
for rezoning hearings
The Nevada County Planning
More realistic schooling to fit
adults and young people for the
world of work may be the new
“thing” in California.
Not that many improvements
Congress.
x «x *
improve vocational education; -:-the floor_on the-range of profunds for vocational education? will help to improve and expand
gress, in a sense, has cast a
aren’t now underway. They are. vote of confidence on what has
But there’s a new financial shot been
in the arm on the horizon from has allocated since 1963 to improve vocational education. On
the other hand, Congress also
indicates a sense of frustration. he said, “the programs would
Commission set Oct, 28-as the
date for second public hearings
on four rezoning matters at a
meeting Monday night when first
hearings were held.
Twenty-two property owners
in Piney Woods, Echo Woods,
and Cascade Cove on Banner
Mountain have petitioned for rezoning property presently in an
unclassified district. . They requested. one-family residential
Why the massive infusion of grams that can be offered. It
offerings to adults who need
basic career or job re-training,
give a shot in the-arm at the
junior. college and high school
levels, plus the new possibilities
at the elementary level.
“At the elementary level,” he
Smith sees it two ways: Condone with the money it
Pe iscoenszcw HAS _ — Much yet must be done to ease be aimed to build incentives, aseeping amendmen’ unemployment, especially for Pirations and goals in career
cational Education Act of 1963.
These, if President Johnson
signs the bill and if Congress
appropriates the funds, will give
the nation’s schools $3.1 billion
in vocational education funds
over the next four years.
For California, according to
Wesley P. Smith, ‘director of vocational education for the State
Department of Education, this
could mean as much as-° $50
million starting next year. That’s
a big boost from the $17 million
the state now gets from Uncle
Sam for. vocational education.
Moreover, compared with the $2
million the state got five years
“COMPLETE SUPPLY
OF
BUILDING
MATERIAL
YUBA RIVER
LUMBER CO.
Town Talk G.V.
265-4521
Downieville
Yard
_ 289-3351
young
groups. :
Smith notes that every year
people and minority preparation. We’ve never had
that before.’ :
The new money, also, he said,
several million young people emphasizes programs aimed at
graduate or leave school without helping the culturally and eduany significant job preparation.
The highest group of unemployed persons is young people
—of white males between the
ages of 16 and 19, 23 per cent
are presently unemployed; nonwhite males, 33 per cent; and
nonwhite females, a staggering
49 per cent.
& oR
“THERE ARE lots of jobs not
being filled because people do
not have adequate preparation,”
Smith said. “Congress and the
cationally disadvantaged as well
as the physically handicapped.
Previously, schools receiving
federal money for these programs had to match it on a
dollar-for-dollar basis. Under the
new plan, the matching requirements are made less stringent
to encourage programs of this
type.
x «* *
SMITH SAID he does not
agree entirely with criticism
that funds received from the
people are saying the solution Vocational Education Act of
lies in giving education more 1963 are doing very little to
relevancy with the world of improve vocational education.
work.” On the other hand, he noted,
Smith explained that the new “vocational education has not
funds will enable many school moved toward improvement as
districts to start vocational edufast as some people would want.
cation programs they have been This is true in California as it
unable to finance solely with is in other places. No one can be
local funds. In addition, they entirely comfortable by the way
will be able to expand and imjt has moved.”
prove existing programs.
However, he stressed, “one
Among these, he listed partof the sharpest improvements in
work part-school programs, exall educational programs the
emplary programs and projects, past three years has been in
improved in-service training of yocational programs. The bigteachers, more and better coungest growth has been at the
seling, and even pre-vocat‘onal post-high school level, particueducation at the elementery Jarly in the field of technical
education. level.
with building sites of approximately one acre or of approximately one-half acre.
These subdivisions are on the
so-called district attorney's list
because they were not properly
filed according to the subdivision
map act. They are composed of
88 lots; however it was noted
several property owners hold
more than one lot.
Original restrictions which
required lots of approximately
one acre for building sites are
not effective after Jan, 1, 1970.
Petitioners,
themselves, were unable to decide whether to ask for one acre
or one-half acre building sites,
and so brought both propositions
to the planning commission.
Petitioners present, planners,
and the county health department
agreed that one acre lots are
desirable. There were no proponents present for one-half
acre building sites.
Approximately one-third of
the property owners inthe Glenbrook Heights Orchard Glen
district petitioned for one family
residential zoning. The area with
streets described as ‘narrow is
presently in an unclassified district.
Some commercial sites were
not included in the requested
zoning. Some property owners
suggested highway frontage be
retained as a commercial zone.
There: were no objections to the ©
proposal other than Edward Litmeeting among.
ke's warning "We will go along.
with highwayfrontage if it does”
not intrude on our narrow
streets."
Alta Sierra Ranches voiced an
objection to a planning commission resolution proposing to zone
1500 acres into a one-family
residential district, with agricultural usage. allowed, with
minimum parcels of 20 acres.
It is presently in an unclassified
district. :
Ed Pasteris, vice president of
Alta Sierra Vista Inc, said:
We are all for zoning but
object to having zoning used to.
control improvements for a subdivision of 1500 acres."
He requested the commission
to consider minimum five-acre
sites, saying Alta Sierra would
construct roads to standard.
Chairman Bert Livingston
"believed it might be a good
idea," and John O'Dell offered
the blessing of the Public Works
Department saying there is
physical access to all lots,
However, Sharon Mahaffey
representing the planning department, said the department
did not encourage splitting of
lots in sub-divisions.
Brian Bishop, deputy county
counsel, suggested the subdivider's request raised a lot of legal questions.
The first public hearing on rezoning lots in Alta Sierra Estates-Seventeen, presently in an
unclassified district, to a one
family residence with lot sizes
as indicated on the map of
record, and a commercial district was closed with no comment
from the subdivider and no objections voiced.
Classified Ads, the
little fellows with the
big pulling power