Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 20

j
4
LOWER TAXES, FEWER SERVICES
Ronald Reagan tipped his hand last week on
his ideas about running California, and how to
pay the tab.
He proposed that if elected governor he would
work to "eliminate double taxation on subsidiary dividends of corporations, " for ."assess‘ment of state and federal land holdings in
California with an in lieu payment returned to
the counties, " and "abolish personal property
tax on household furnishings.”
He didnot say where he intended to raise the
money to replace the funds lost through these
procedures.
‘ On the other hand, Governor Brown came out
the same day for substantialtaxcuts: he wants
tocompletely eliminate the household property
tax, make substantial cuts in school property
taxes, give special property tax relief to
low-income elderly householders and reform
the: business inventory tax.
' However, he told how he plans to raise the
funds to replace money thus lost: He called
for turning back of $5 billion of the federal
income ‘tax to the states on a population and
tax burden formula, declaring this would provide California with about $500 million a year.
Promises of tax cuts which are not accompanied by suggestions for where the new money will come .afrom are not only seductive;
the; tax cuts would be wonderful,. but concur
rent cuts in services and facilities now provided by the state would be disastrous.
We don't want to cut back on the schools,
roads, hospitals, parks and other public necessities which, during Governor Brown's administration, have kept pace with California's
rapid growth.
The risk of yieldingto bright promises, without searching out their ultimate meaning is
real,
We urge Mr. Reagan to tell us what state department programs he plans tocut, when he
cuts back tax revenues.
THE SAD FREEWAY LESSON
A lot of people in Nevada County breathed a
long sigh ofrelief last week when the Division
of Highways announced it had given freeway
contractor, Norman I. Fadel, Inc., the five
day notice to show adequate progress on the
job.
Since Fadel had already been removed from
two other jobs recently after five day notice,
most people feel that this will be the next step
by the state here.
What has happened to the project here is
unfortunate. The state had so much adverse
publicity from the Nevada City project before
it started, that officials hoped everything
would gosmoothly here to heal wounds. State
officials went out of their way to see that it
did, but still the job became fouled up and a
lot of local people became financially entangled
in the mess.
Everyone from the Division of Highways, the
city council right on down to the local merc=
hants, can learn something from this fiascoand
perhaps lessons learned here will prevent such
a situation from occuring again.
ee
ee “ ‘ “*
Ese ae ne sortie “Bi
Quartz Gold Discovery Monument in Grass Valley
)
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
To The Editor charges of plagiarism,
I request equal space with one
Jack Bassett whose letter appeared in your August 31st issue,
Mr, Bassett’s letter implies detailed knowledge of the methods
of higrading in the Grass Valley
mines, and it also contains
Now I cant be sure that Mr.
Bassett was gunning for me but
it so happens that I wrote a short
generalized poem about the
specimen bosses of old here in
Grass Valley, which appears in
my booklet “Pick & Shovel
IN THE FOOTHILLS VEIN
A FIRM ROAD POLICY IS NEEDED
The Grand Jury report delivered to the supervisors last week attacking the county"s methods of taking roads into the county road
system raises some very interesting questions,
The answer that narrow, pitted and unpaved roads mentioned in
in the grand jury report should have been taken into the county
road system years ago when a lot of other similar roads came under county jurisdiction, seems like hardly a sufficient repty to the
questions posed by the Grand Jury.
One of the biggest questions, and one which is unanswered, is
should the rest of the taxpayers in the county have to help foot the
bill to maintain a road for someone else? Most of these roads, as
the grand jury pointed out, do not meet any kind of road standards,
The county, by taking them into the system, immediately assumes a responsibility to start spending money on them,
Defenders of the theory that because they build a house and pay
taxes, the county should take care of their road, will hold to this
theory, They will say that they pay taxes that go toward taking
care of roads elsewhere in the county and see no reason why someone else should not take care of their roads,
And this raises a question that, as more and more people move
here, has to be answered, This is the question of how much the
taxpayer can expect to get for his money and just where the responsibility of the county for road building and maintenance stops
and starts,
‘
Many people move here because they like to get away from it
all, They buy 40 acres out in the boonies, build a house, wait
until the rains come and then appear before the supervisors and
complain bitterly about the road that hardly had any use until they
built their house, Should the taxpayer in Penn Valley be respon~
sible for taking care of the road in Red Dog that is now creating
difficulties for someone who wanted to get away from ft all? We
think not,
The population in the county is going to increase and as it does
so will the pressure to take more and more roads into the county
system and maintain and upgrade them, Unless the board of supervisors is willing to saddle all of the taxpayers with the role of
footing the bill of maintaining everyone's cow path and jeep toad,
it will have to come up with hard, sensible standards for roads to
poe es into the county system -= and then stick to those stane*ee2e8
WE WERE chided last week for not having a strong editorial on
Admission Day, We told our accuser that we were not admitting
anything,
e®eesses
DO YOU FEEL smug because you survived the highway. mayhem
over Labor Day? Now you can celebrate, The state eit ietdene
National Highway Week from Sept, 18-24 and you can all go out
«eeDon Hoagland
and dance on the unfinished freeway,
Poems,” My information on this
subject was gleaned from tran= .sient miners with whom I worked many years ago and in many
different mines of the west and
southwest as set forth on the last
page of my book,
It is true that I never “saw the
guts” of a Grass Valley mine,
and Ican truthfully say that fact
leaves me with no regrets, for
reasons which I would be glad
to discuss with Mr. Bassett.
Mr. Carlos Morbio, of the
Sutro family in San Francisco,
I give you as a Califomia re~
ference as t.o my mining abi.
lity.
Astothe charge of plagiarism,
Mr. Bassett, “them are fightin’
words!" No erstwhile mining
engineer can get away with that
without repercussions.
If my memory serves me I
seemtorecall reading in a certain Hebrew document about a
young fellow called Jesus Christ
who is reputed to have said “It
isnot what goes into your mouth
that hurts you, it is what comes
out of it,”
Cordially,
Herb Altman
NEVADA COUNTY NUGGET
Published Every Wednesday By
NUGGET PUBLISHING CO.,
INC, 318 Broad Street, Nevada City, Calif.
George R. Kane, PublisherDonald L, Hoagland, Editor:
and General Manager.
Second class postage
paid at Nevada City, Calif.
Adjudicated a legal newspaper
of general circulation by the
Nevada County Superior
Court, June 3, 1960, Decree
No, 12,406,
Subscription rates: One year,
$3; Two years, $5.
kkkkkkkke
AWARD WINNING
NEWSPAPER