Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 8

SENIOR CITIZENS’had a treat Tuesday at the
Nevada County Fairgrounds as they were served a
picnic lunch from Gold Country Meals, the Grass
Valley-Nevada City Kiwanis Club and Sierra United
Presbyterian Church volunteers. In photo above
pa
Earl GJ Waters
Proposals for a one, house
Jegislature have been dusted off
and put back in circulation from
two directions. One, fostered by
State Treasurer Jess Unruh, and
amazingly backed by former
Governor Edmund G. Brown,
seeks to-achieve this by way of
an initiative. The other is contained in a measure by Senator
Arlen Gregorio. It would also
have to win approval by the
voters.
Unruh’s revival of: the
scheme, in operation in only one
of the 50 states, is understandable. Thwarted while
Speaker in his efforts to control
state government by the Senate,
he retaliated with the
unicameral notion as a means to
eliminate that which stood in his
way. Unsuccessful in that effort
he took the more direct route to
gain dominance over the state
and ran for governor, with no
greater success.
Now on the comeback trail he
again is making his bid for
power and has trotted out the old
unicameral plot. Brown’s endorsement of the plan is nothing
short of incredible. In his two
terms in office he established a
good record as governor. But
that was only because the
Senate wrenched his programs
through over the opposition of an
ambitious and vengeful Speaker
named Jess Unruh.
Gregorio’s sponsorship of
legislation to.convert the
Legislature into a body without
the checks and balance provided
by a two house legislature is
simply the idealistic nonsense of
one who hasn’t been around long
enough to know better.
Just
of office he has blossomed into a
veteran lawmaker with all of the
answers. Unfortunately for
California, seventeen of the
Senators who may vote on his
proposal haven’t been around
_ any longer than he has, seven of
them elected only last year.
To make matters worse, out of
the forty members of the Senate
only six of them have been there
more than 9 years.
The largest change in
membership of the Senate occurred in 1967 following the
reapportionment mandated by
Earl Warren’s ‘‘one-man, onevote” Supreme Court ruling.
Fifteen new senators took the
oath of office, most of them from
Los Angeles. Some consolation
may be found in the fact that all
but three of them had served in
the Assembly.
As for the Assembly the
reassurance of experience in
office is not even as good as the
Senate. In that house 23 members are in their freshman year
and 16 are starting their second
term. Only 13 have more than
ten years service and only four
have as much as 20 years, two
less than the Senate which has
half the number of members.
Of particular import to those
in rural and northern California
is the fact that 16 Senators and
30 Assemblymen are from Los
his second term:
September 17, 1975 Wed.,
8
two ladies get special treatment from, back left:
Nancy Sanford, Sierra United Presbyterian; Robert
Caris of the Kiwanis Club; and Todd Lowell. a member of the church youth group..
Angeles. Of the 80 assemblymen
47 are from below the
Tehachapis and 14 more are
from the urbanized Bay Area.
One can only conclude that if.
the Legislature should vote to
put the unicameral issue on the
ballot it won’t be the voice of
experience ing nor will it
be those with the interests
of rural and northern California,
However, since the proposals
‘would reduce the total
legislative membership. from
the present 120 to the. odd
number of 99, it is unlikely that
the legislators will approve the
measure. Each would fear the
loss of his seat and few
lawmakers exhibit such a death
wish.
The real threat will come from
the initiative proponents.
Already a notorious ballot
proposition promoter is gearing
up to gather the signatures
necessary to place the measure.
on next year’s ballot.
There are many with long
experience observing state
government who feel that if such
a proposition goes before the
voters it will pass.
Who is to say:they are wrong?
Over the years Californians
have witnessed many crackpot
schemes submitted to the voters
and more than one gaining
passage.
If the people of California are
to be saved from what can only
develop into a virtual dictatorship by the presiding officer of a one house legislature,
Unicameral legislature
opposition to a unicameral
legislature must be gathered up
now.
Much will depend upon the
newspapers of the state. It will
be to them that the people will
look for guidance. If they are not
conditioned before the barrage
of campaign propaganda is
unloosed -by unicameral
promoters it may well be too
late.
For northern Californians the
job should not be too difficult.
Only the blind can fail to see that
the Legislature, already heavily
dominated by Los Angeles,
would become a mere tool for
the megalomania of that
megalopolis if there were no
Senate to buffer it.
CLASSIFIED
ADS
The Nevada County Nugget 7
PUBLIC NOTICE
PES
10. Crafts & Services
ROBERT L. ROSS, JR.
OPTOMETRIST’
147 Mill St., Ph. 273-6246
ur Wall ads
‘TO WORK FOR YOU
Classified ads work
NOTICE TO .
CONTRACTORS
NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN
that the City of Nevada City,
California, will receive bids for
the following work:
CONSTRUCTION OF .
TWO DOUBLES
TENNIS COURTS
Each bid shall be in accordance with the plans,
specifications, and other contract documents now on-file with
the City Clerk, City Hall, Broad
Street, Nevada City, California,
and Sierra Western Engineering
Co., Inc., 230 Colfax Avenue,
Grass Valley, California, where
they may be examined and
copies thereof obtained from the
office of Sierra Western
Engineering Co., Inc., 230 Colfax
Avenue, P.O. Box 1110, Grass
Valley, California, 95945, upon
deposit of $25.00 per set, NONE
of which deposit will be refunded. Checks shall be made
payable to Sierra Western
Engineering Co., Inc.
Bidders are hereby notified
that pursuant to Section 1770 et
seq. of the Labor Code of the
State of California, the City
Council has ascertained the
general prevailing rate of hourly
wages and rates for legal
holidays ‘and overtime work in
the locality where this work is to
be performed, for each craft or
type of workmen or mechanics
needed to execute the work of
the contract, which will be
awarded to the successful
bidder. A copy of said rates has
been placed on file with the City
Clerk and will be made
available.to any interested party
on request.
Notice is hereby given that all
bidders may be required to
furnish a sworn statement. of
financial responsibility,
technical ability and experience
before an award is made to any
particular bidder.
Before submitting proposals,
all bidders must be licensed in
accordance with the provisions
of Chapter 9 of Division 3 inclusive and as amended to date,
of the Business and Professions
Code of fhe State,of California.
The successful bidder will be
required to furnish the acceptable bonds for, Faithful
Performance and Labor and
Material as described in the
.Contract Documents, and he will
be required to obtain a business
license from the City of Nevada
City and pay related fees.
Each bia snall-pe made out on
@ form to be obtained at the
office ‘of Sierra Western
Engineering Co., Inc., 230 Colfax
Avenue, P.O. Box 1110, Grass
Valley, California, 95945, and
shall be accompanied by acertified check, cashier’s check .
or Bid Bond, made payable to
. the order of the City of Nevada
. Citv. California. in an amount,
‘equal to ten percent (10) of the.
amount ot the total bid: Said
check or bond shall be aivenas a
guarantee that the bidder will
execute the Contract jn conformity with the form provided
in the Contract Documents and
will furnish the necessary bonds
and required information within
ten (10) calendar days after
being notified’ to do so by the
City of Nevada City following
the award’of the Contract.
Bids shall. be filed with the
City Clerk of the City of Nevada
City,/at the City Hall, Nevada
City, California, at or before
8700 P.M., on Monday; October
6th, 1975, and will be opened and
read publicly on said date and
hour at the City Hall of the City
of Nevada City. 5
The City reserves the right to
reject any or all bids or the
waive any informalities or
minor irregularities in any bid.
No bidder may withdraw his
bid for a period of thirty (30)
calendar days after the date set
for the opening thereof.
TERESA CASSETTARI
CtTY CLERK
OF THE CITY OF
NEVADA CITY
CALIFORNIA
Dated: September 9, 1975
Dates of Publication: September \17, 24, 1975.
per weives esas ewe eeeaaeaas
ry