Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 16

SMALL TOWN : S
u@ ©
EDITORIAL.
MR. TAXPAYER AND THE
SIERRA COLLEGE BOND ISSUE
"We vote to joina junior college district, andthe next year they hit us with
a bond issue."
Taxpayers, generally, are expected
togripe. And Mr. Nevada County Taxpayer would seem to have his gripe
based on fact, as he commented on the
Sierra College bond issue vote due next
Tuesday. .
We hope that by new Mr. Nevada
County Taxpayer has had time to study
andto judge the college bond issue on
its merits, andto judge the bite it proposes to take in light of true comparables.
With student population booming,
Sierra College has an acknowledged
need for more classrooms. The bonds
would furnish money for an addition to
the Science Building, an Engineering
Building, a Lecture-Theater Building
where one of the three rooms can be
usedasa theater after the day's
classes are over, an-addition to the
-Music Building, an Industrial Technology Building, an Administration
Building thereby freeing the administrative space in the college library for its
intended use, and landscaping and
lighting on the new campus.
Mr. Nevada County Taxpayer real-izes, we are sure, that the need for
these improvements is urgent. But what
about taxes?
‘Well, let's take a look at the junior
college taxes in Nevada County.
Up to the time that western Nevada
County voted to become a part of the
Sierra College district, this area paid
"tuition" for its students to attend any
of several junior colleges.
The last full year of tuition taxation
showedataxrate of 54 cents, in 196263. This tax rate was the highest on
record in Nevada County for junior college tuition, but the trend indicated
that it would go even higher each year;
and this assumption would seem to be
borne out by an increasing number of
local students heading for junior colleges.
More students were heading for junior
colleges for three reasons--~-a greater
interest in college education, more
restrictive entrance” qualifications at
four-year college and university level,
and an increasing number of high school
graduates qualified for college education.
So Mr. Nevada County Taxpayer
hoped to stabilize or lower his junior
college tax rate by joining Sierra College district.
MALL WORLD
Now, Sierra College District's base
taxrate is 36 cents per $100 assessed
valuation. In addition, there is a bond
redemptionrate of 13 cents. And if the
current bond issue passes, the district
estimates that the latter rate will peak
at 20 cents---in other words, a total
of 56 cents per $100 assessed valuation. .
It would seem, therefore, that Mr.
Nevada County Taxpayer can pass the
Sierra College‘bond issue and still have
his junior college tax bill "stabilized"
at a figure barely above the tuition he
was paying, and probably at a figure
below that which tuition would have required.
Ofcourse, Mr. Nevada County Taxpayer could refuse to pass the bonds,
in which case he would have seen a
drop in the college district's rate as
compared with his old tuition rate.
But Mr. Nevada County Taxpayer
would then be forced to admit that the
saving of sevencents per $100 assessed valuation was more ‘important to
himthanthe education of his children.
We can't believe that this would
please Mrs. Nevada County Taxpayer;
and we urge thembothto go to the polls
Tuesday and.vote "Yes" on the Sierra
College construction bond issue.
SIERRA BYWAYS .
INTERNAL REVENUE THWARTED
IN TIMBER TAX PLAN
TIMBER TAXES.....Congressman Harold T. Johnson
passes word along that the Ways and Means Committee
refusedto make changes in the corporation tax structure
which would have relative to timber, and actually improved tax laws in the eyes of some individuals are concerned.....The Internal Revenue Service had proposed
the elimination of capital gains treatment on timber and
hoped to tax timber sales as regular income..... The
Congressman estimates this could have cost individual
timber owners some $15 million each year..... During
* the committee hearings, Congressman Johnson joined
with industry and urged no change. “Altering the capital
gains treatment on timber would destroy incentives for
maintaining investments, discourage reforestation and
conservation practices, cause a decline in employment,
and damage seriously the tax base of local county government and school districts, " he told the committee...
...And Nevada County's tax base has already suffered
heavy blows this year, too. It's carrying an 18 cent overloadnow..... But Ways and Means actually changed the
rules on taxation of timber sales to make them more
favorable for the individual.
CALIFORNIA
“A SCIENTIST HAS
A LIMITED EDUCATION’
The most thankless: job in the world has always been
that of the informed critic of the weaknesses of his society. Heis likely to end up either with a severe case of
_ hemlock poisoning or, if he is lucky, without friends.
Robert M. Hutchins, president of the Center for the
Study of Democratic Institutions in Santa Barbara, is such
a critic, but so far asI know he is in excellent health
and has a good many friends and admirers.
Hutchins persuaded the Fund for the Republic to set up
the Santa Barbara Center, where for several years a
working group of scholars, occasionally augmented by
outside authorities, has been carrying out well-publicized discussions aimed at “clarifying basic questions of
freedom and justice, especially those raised by the
emergence of twentieth century institutions. "
The guiding spirit of the discussions is usually Hutchins,
who presides’ at a long table in an old mansion high in
the hills above the city. Out of the discussions emerge
publications, conferences, and a public stimulated by
new ideas.
The latest Center publication, “Science, Scientists,
and Politics," is a-collection of: papers delivered at a
Center conference on the responsibilities of science ex~ecutives. Inthe lead paper, Hutchins says that scientists
are educated to do nothing but collect facts and are so
specialized they have “no general ideas. "
“A scientist has a limited education. He labors on the
topic of his dissertation, wins the Nobel Prize by the
time he isthirty-five, and suddenly has nothing to do...
While he was pursuing his specialization, science has
gone past him. He has no alternative but to spend the
rest of his life making a nuisance of himself.”
Hutchins thinksthat problems of bureaucracy, nationalism, and technology facing mankind do not lend themselves to “scientific procedure. "
“Our essential problem is what kind of people we want
to be and what kind of world we want to have. Such
questions cannot be solved by experiment and observation. But if we know what justice is, which is not a scientific matter, science and many other disciplines may
help us get it..."
The solution of our main problems, Hutchins writes,
“depends on moral and intellectual virtues rather than
on specialized knowledge. "
He recommends a “reorganization of American education and a redefinition of its purposes. A liberal education, including scientific education, must be esta+
blished for all. “
But Hutchins admits that "this cataclysm is not likely
to occur in the lifetime of the youngest person reading
this." He proposes, therefore, that there be an "immediate program. ..to build intellectual communities outside the American educational system. "
At least one such community is already in existence-Hutchins’ own Center in Santa Barbara.
---Alfred Heller
WASHINGTON CALLING — ;
LIKE THE FRENCH,
WE: MAKE MISTAKES, TOO
WASHINGTON---Towinthe war and lose the peace-that isthe pattern in Viet-Nam threatening to repeat the
unhappy precedent of other “victories” achieved by
American military and economic strength.
The events of recent days seem simply incredible in
light of the great expenditure of American manpower
and money insupport of the government of President Ngo
Dinh Diem. Not the least fantastic is the intervention of
President Charles de Gaulle.
For if this does nothing else, it recalls some of the ©
most painful history of the tragedy of Indo-China. The
French made almost every mistake possible. The end >
wasa partition of Viet-Nam that narrowly averted catastrophe and a blood bath overwhelming the thousands of
French planters and business men for whom the colony
had long been a source of profits and jobs.
In March, 1946, the French engineered a deal with the
wily Communist leader, Ho Chi Minh, After months in
Paris, Ho went back to Saigon expecting that he would
preside over a united and neutralist Viet-Nam. But opposition French elements in the Viet-Namese capital
succeeded in killing that deal and Ho retired to the North
or organize the Communist guerrillas.
For eight years the flower of the French officer corps
fought with courage and desperate futility in the ugly .
jungle war. As head of a so-called independent government, the French were backing a puppet emperor, Bao
Dai. While he had personal bravery, charm and a sense
of humor, Bao Dai lacked the one absolute essential -~
support of the Viet-Namese people. He took long holidays in a luxury villa on the French Riviera, where he
currently lives in grand style.
During the last two to three years of the French war
the United States was pouring in support at the rate of
Ly
"9 aBeg
‘E961 ‘6I Joquicidag’* ‘1088nN ou’
9 o8eg*'
. Page 7
.The Nugget,.
. September 19, 1963..
Page 7..