Enter a name, company, place or keywords to search across this item. Then click "Search" (or hit Enter).

Copy the Page Text to the Clipboard

Show the Page Image

Show the Image Page Text


More Information About this Image

Get a Citation for Page or Image - Copy to the Clipboard

Go to the Previous Page (or Left Arrow key)

Go to the Next Page (or Right Arrow key)
Page: of 22

ae Se ee
VIOL
OL 92%da
. February 20, 1964..
Page 11
. The Nugget
Page 4k
SIERRA BYWAYS
OUT IN LEFT FIELD
ON THE LEFT.....I've been taking quite a ribbing this
week, Last week's front page picture showed Governor
Edmund G, Brown presenting the Merit Award for General Excellence fromthe California Publisher's Association
to yours truly who accepted it on behalf of the Nugget
and Publisher Alfred Heller. ....I've/heard about it ever
since, and I must say that even the Republicans were
good-natured in their kidding---and the congratulations
of all friends and neighbors to the Nugget staff were
greatly appreciated..... But the sharpest ribbing came
from other staff members who felt it was quite presumptuous to note in the caption of the picture that I was the.
one onthe left. And perhaps it was..... There is a story
behind this, however. Each publisher or representative
of an award-winning newspaper was reminded to position
himself on the governor's right (which puts the governor
on the right of the photo). Joe Ritter, publisher of the
San Jose Mercury and News, was the first to claim an
award and was the only one to forget his instructions.
All the rest of us followed instructions,
---Dean Thompson
WASHINGTON CALLING
TEAM OF LYNDON AND:
LADY BIRD WINS FRIENDS
WASHINGTON ---The Lyndon-Lady Bird treatment is
paying off. That~is the conviction on Capitol Hill as
Congress moves on the tax cut and civil rights at a pace
that a short time ago seemed inconceivable.
Privately leaders on the Hill are saying that with the
progress rolled upthus far the President may even get his
civilrights bill through the Senate. This is an indication
of the way the atmosphere has changed in littke more
than a month.
In winning friends and influencing members of Congress Mrs. Johnson is given almost as much credit as the
President himself. A recent incident illustrates the way
her warmth and patience have developed over the years
as an invaluable asset to her husband.
Around midnight at the end of a stag dinner in a downtown hotelthe President invited two Senate friends, who
happened to be at opposite ends of the political spectrum, tocome to the White House with him for a nightcap. The President's mansion was as dark, the Senators
noted, as a lonely farmhouse in accord with the Johnson
order about keeping unnecessary lights tumed off. In an
upstairs sitting room the President got out the drinks and
they settled down to the staple of Washington conversation--politics.
Around quarter to one the President disappeared. He
returned shortly with Mrs. Johnson, who looked as cheerfulandas ready for the fray as though it were high noon.
"I knew Lady Birdwasthe one you really wanted to see, "
the President saidin effect, “and so 1 went and woke her
up."
That isa test before which any wife might flinch. But
after 30 years of marriage to that dynamo, as a close
friend>put it, Lady Bird is a saint. And she is also a
knowing political partner who works as tirelessly at the
great game of politics as does her husband,
The Johnson parties for all the members of the Senate
and now. for House members are unique. After refreshmentsthe men get a briefing from the President and the
Secretary of State. Mrs. Johnson takes the ladies on a
tour of the upstairs rooms, including her bedroom and
that of the President. Then there is dancing and, with,
the infectious enthusiasm of the Johnsons, creaking joints
get exercised that have hitherto seemed adequate only
to move the Congressmen onto the floor of House or Senate and off again.
The effect on the distaff side has been notable. SeveralRepublican wives have been heard to say that under
the Eisenhowers they never got beyond the East Room at
formalreceptions and then only once or twice during the
two Eisenhower terms.
Under the previous administration there was resentment
on Capitol Hill over what seemed to be the Kennedy's
preference, when they entertained, for bright, amusing
people ‘out of :the jet set or for articulate intellectuals.
The Kennedys were said to have a low boring point and
Congressional wives in particular resented what appeared
to be a circle of exclusivity.
While allthis is frosting on the cake, nevertheless the
care and feeding of wives is an important department in
the Washington rule book. The real effort is in the unremitting pressure the President maintains on every single
individualin the Congress who can by any stretch of the
imagination be susceptible or even interested. That was
never more true than during the series of squeak votes by
which amendments to the tax bill were rejected in a
week of Senate voting.
For many liberal Democrats the measure was a hard
pill to swallow since it gives so much more to business
and proportionately to the upper bracket taxpayer. As a
counter certain of the amendments, notably that of Sen.
Abraham Ribicoff granting a tax credit for college costs,
hada powerful attraction. When one of his leaders spoke
wistfully of how much he would like to go for the Ribicoff amendment, the President rounded on him:
"What's the matter? Are you a Johnson man or aren't
you?" :
The amendment was defeated by a vote of 48 to 45.
So were other proposals that the Treasury feared would
greatly reduce revenues and thereby increase the Federal
deficit. The President is determined to keep the economy image and the goal of a balanced budget wellto
the fore.
These are, ofcourse, the first hurdles. By far the biggest test willcome later this month when the civil rights
bill reaches the Senate floor, But in an atmosphere that
has been™~radically changed this can-do President wants
to believe that-anything is possible.
(Copyright 1964)
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
OBJECTS TO EVICTION
To The Editor:
Ithas been my deep and abiding pleasure to have been
a resident of Nevada City for a little less than a year. 1
ama “new-comer" an artist engaged daily in the viscissitudes of my profession, I live and work in the upper
floor of the old Yuba Canal Building, next door to Ott's
Assay Office. This space is uniquely suited to my work,
Irent from the temporary owners, the Division of Highways.
As youknow, because of strong community persuasion,
the principal brick structures of both Ott's Assay Office
and Yuba Canal buildings are to be saved from freeway
demolition, although the wooden additions to both buildings are to be torn down soon to accommodate construction. Indeed, one of the two additions to Yuba Canal
Building recently collapsed in the snow storm, The other
isnot used except that it houses my toilet which could
be easily relocated.
---Marquis Childs
Recently the Division of Highways sent me a 30 day .
eviction notice “because portions of the building are to
ODD BODKINS ...
... SUCH AS
OFFENSE, AND
DEFENSE , BALL
CONTROL , AND
CONDITIONING +
.
SCORE WAS
SEVENTY
1O
2ERO AT THE
HALE IN FAVOR
OF THE NISITOR,
q’Lt SAY ORE
be demolished", and because they wanted to “reduce the
building to single tenancy". In answer to my subsequent
petitions to withdraw the eviction notice (since the necessary demolition need not influence my tenancy in the
main building) The Division of Highways has made it
clear that they prefer that the entire building be available to the ground floor tenant for use as a... museum
because he “owns the doors and windows” and that this
was the prime reason for eviction. I have written the
Division of Highways asking that these reasons for eviction be reconsidered. Moreover, a few weeks ago a news
article appeared in a Sacramento paper promising that
an “Indian Museum" would be installed inthe space I
occupy, as if by pre-arrangement.
It is possible that athird museum in Nevada City could
be a good thing provided that it showed significant
material, freely accessible and was well designed. It
could no doubt be a boon to the antique business.
But I certainly do not think that the Division of Highways is legitimately charged with designating the space
I rent or any spacé ~ as a.,, museum, Or using its
enormous influence in behalf of any individual to install
him in space rightly occupied by another.
My use of the rooms in no way disfigures the building
or detracts from its illustrious history. (It may, indeed,
addtoit). Further, I think my rights to use this space in
the pursuit of my creative profession are as just and as
rewarding to the community as the merchant-tenant on
the ground floor if not more so.
It seems quite clear that the reasons advanced by the
Division of Highways for my eviction are empty, and ©
that they are using their power to discriminate among
the tenants of the Yuba Canal Building. They are, indeed, meddling in private affairs in Nevada City affairs that have nothing to do with building a freeway.
I think the community should know another instance
of the misuse of power exercised by the Division of High‘ways. Clayton Lewis’
Nevada City
NUGGET GETS VALENTINE
The following Valentine was sent to the Nugget, long
a critic of state division: of highways freeway location
and design policies, by an anonymous admirer.
The Dreeway Planning
Commission announaes that
construction will begin
immediately on an underpass
and interchange ught where
your house és sitting.
Wishing to avold imposition
to you the Commtsslon voted
to move your house 20 ft:
East of its present location
to avoid placing an off vamp
through your bathroom
EVEN IF THE
THING FOR
OUR BONS .«: